Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A53C64ED8 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 22:17:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229712AbjBXWRP (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2023 17:17:15 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57474 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229516AbjBXWRO (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2023 17:17:14 -0500 Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A350199E4 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 14:17:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1677277032; x=1708813032; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1zn5LRVaEjUKXrDtSzrbPheNzGYbFT6PbXB8m5y5GgI=; b=XCsAepgjDV3bHAtmVW1Qjdi9hdKDffZD/L2tMqFEaPLMs6xgXCuYSts5 ND98srkm89mWXMuAwPt9w5sthaL+XtC6j96nTFcG3WSieQpq1WBAup+yM g8NKcxf2o2qvcWYIilFUbxcx4p7LrwphFD8n4n56OpuLzbu9mJyfTrRoS DGdPQRiWY54dB8u5pWRht86RYopn23eP/HuITM/fWyMjH7Q3w7p0VMa9s v0t9vSOzQnhNgJOQFvbw0hXMUcnYbVWAJEe6/XxLtHGpGpv8Juani0BSd LM3Vt4Olj2wTKK/ygyLmh0mFq9nR98Kadf4ic3MIjoapJXvCXVWXgbraJ g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10631"; a="317350128" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,326,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="317350128" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Feb 2023 14:17:11 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10631"; a="703325953" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,326,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="703325953" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 3895f5c55ead) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Feb 2023 14:17:09 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 3895f5c55ead with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1pVgNI-0002lD-2s; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 22:17:08 +0000 Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2023 06:16:29 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Chen Zhongjin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, chenzhongjin@huawei.com, akpm@linux-foudation.org, wuchi.zero@gmail.com, ben-linux@fluff.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: profiling: Set prof_cpu_mask to NULL after free Message-ID: <202302250609.vmze90DB-lkp@intel.com> References: <20230224084945.134038-1-chenzhongjin@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230224084945.134038-1-chenzhongjin@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Chen, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [also build test ERROR on v6.2 next-20230224] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Chen-Zhongjin/x86-profiling-Set-prof_cpu_mask-to-NULL-after-free/20230224-165419 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230224084945.134038-1-chenzhongjin%40huawei.com patch subject: [PATCH] x86: profiling: Set prof_cpu_mask to NULL after free config: arm-randconfig-r004-20230222 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230225/202302250609.vmze90DB-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project db89896bbbd2251fff457699635acbbedeead27f) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # install arm cross compiling tool for clang build # apt-get install binutils-arm-linux-gnueabi # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/ed9b4879e816862f4f6210b1c429bcbebac6d317 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Chen-Zhongjin/x86-profiling-Set-prof_cpu_mask-to-NULL-after-free/20230224-165419 git checkout ed9b4879e816862f4f6210b1c429bcbebac6d317 # save the config file mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=arm olddefconfig COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=arm SHELL=/bin/bash If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202302250609.vmze90DB-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> kernel/profile.c:136:16: error: array type 'cpumask_var_t' (aka 'struct cpumask[1]') is not assignable prof_cpu_mask = NULL; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 1 error generated. vim +136 kernel/profile.c 98 99 100 int __ref profile_init(void) 101 { 102 int buffer_bytes; 103 if (!prof_on) 104 return 0; 105 106 /* only text is profiled */ 107 prof_len = (_etext - _stext) >> prof_shift; 108 109 if (!prof_len) { 110 pr_warn("profiling shift: %u too large\n", prof_shift); 111 prof_on = 0; 112 return -EINVAL; 113 } 114 115 buffer_bytes = prof_len*sizeof(atomic_t); 116 117 if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&prof_cpu_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) 118 return -ENOMEM; 119 120 cpumask_copy(prof_cpu_mask, cpu_possible_mask); 121 122 prof_buffer = kzalloc(buffer_bytes, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN); 123 if (prof_buffer) 124 return 0; 125 126 prof_buffer = alloc_pages_exact(buffer_bytes, 127 GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO|__GFP_NOWARN); 128 if (prof_buffer) 129 return 0; 130 131 prof_buffer = vzalloc(buffer_bytes); 132 if (prof_buffer) 133 return 0; 134 135 free_cpumask_var(prof_cpu_mask); > 136 prof_cpu_mask = NULL; 137 return -ENOMEM; 138 } 139 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests