Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338FAC7EE23 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 08:18:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229525AbjBYISw (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Feb 2023 03:18:52 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32900 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229452AbjBYISu (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Feb 2023 03:18:50 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x102e.google.com (mail-pj1-x102e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D5C910A82 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 00:18:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id x34so1402621pjj.0 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 00:18:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bytedance.com; s=google; t=1677313102; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AsL47J7DzrSRjS/g3c5jkzLcMkIvj6gluZDiMTud1Ck=; b=dkWq/lRIS6rF3yoxHvLbrsc7h7kNCFDAxZeSKhqpr44UZVR7WDMLX1PA5ZGwxEcwHc qD7knbmKLg0KDwIpHblMgaN7J3WibVarj7LHLM+TMrephoEh/XwzKGN0OJo7Zi3htey6 pNxGmuzPiVRVbA2P8IRp0lWGKtGWdr8ABlpMF4oQesQUMESKkRqd1tUwea4E8PS/qWHO X5xFSXx4bm4K0N2u4hDV/6yEJ9PKUsyJEqsnrhkrAklYtOD88bE5m4QPul+viV1mNfQF rUlT8WPf8C4I6HMKtrzPwFXBN1R8nzPlteSxJ+gf0E2QnHjzuagiw38OJEM4kVTFFaUo /evw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1677313102; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AsL47J7DzrSRjS/g3c5jkzLcMkIvj6gluZDiMTud1Ck=; b=1BsckHYVBnilY5E0asUsZ7YyO5Hzr+z/UDlvi3oOZRVTFsYxUyHcwd96qcBdwHnzY6 xZAGSX2fTaqQVR6mzw9a0pvyn0+cNhyebi+nzmzbLR2gL5jifZ3etjG3ytE5PJZQTr3b KORn5z34E1+Iw2rkUMLzRapK3ghRwh0eAtnhTPBA/fcCvZzV8WYu3rNH4Fd56vaL2Om0 h5QPBVtwfemQDYAOUOct0cu9sLTYZ4BE9r8l/lPlF7u/0ko5448r2TU2Vdc7kqsOBfMI vFN1NrntYK1PnNNpQBw+jJICTf4Ns8OYHhcUARNgNWB4qhZlJFcCJUEuGaYkAAeN8t8H ws8g== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUV2CbsemoniJEdfliehqafyIq1rYrJjA43w0V6lehPhKYAz0qi HWg9UEPHe8x4jv+X0gd4N5IkPg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+6C8v4zlUBW6YX8TWQM59wHZsXC1+GAytwBOWDwTRxNjpB1aCiXdpz+VaxC/DOf9WWZJg2vw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:3d24:b0:cb:692e:6314 with SMTP id y36-20020a056a203d2400b000cb692e6314mr17184556pzi.6.1677313101621; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 00:18:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.200.9.56] ([139.177.225.248]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v26-20020a62a51a000000b005a9131b6668sm735663pfm.2.2023.02.25.00.18.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 25 Feb 2023 00:18:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6f8f01b5-d802-db64-7725-8481c67c13a2@bytedance.com> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2023 16:18:14 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] mm: vmscan: add a map_nr_max field to shrinker_info Content-Language: en-US To: tkhai@ya.ru Cc: sultan@kerneltoast.com, dave@stgolabs.net, penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, paulmck@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , Shakeel Butt , Michal Hocko , Roman Gushchin , Muchun Song , David Hildenbrand , Yang Shi References: <20230223132725.11685-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> <20230223132725.11685-2-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> From: Qi Zheng In-Reply-To: <20230223132725.11685-2-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2023/2/23 21:27, Qi Zheng wrote: > To prepare for the subsequent lockless memcg slab shrink, > add a map_nr_max field to struct shrinker_info to records > its own real shrinker_nr_max. > > No functional changes. > > Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng I missed Suggested-by here, hi Kirill, can I add it? Suggested-by: Kirill Tkhai > --- > include/linux/memcontrol.h | 1 + > mm/vmscan.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++----------- > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h > index b6eda2ab205d..aa69ea98e2d8 100644 > --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h > +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h > @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ struct shrinker_info { > struct rcu_head rcu; > atomic_long_t *nr_deferred; > unsigned long *map; > + int map_nr_max; > }; > > struct lruvec_stats_percpu { > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c > index 9c1c5e8b24b8..9f895ca6216c 100644 > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > @@ -224,9 +224,16 @@ static struct shrinker_info *shrinker_info_protected(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, > lockdep_is_held(&shrinker_rwsem)); > } > > +static inline bool need_expand(int new_nr_max, int old_nr_max) > +{ > + return round_up(new_nr_max, BITS_PER_LONG) > > + round_up(old_nr_max, BITS_PER_LONG); > +} > + > static int expand_one_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, > int map_size, int defer_size, > - int old_map_size, int old_defer_size) > + int old_map_size, int old_defer_size, > + int new_nr_max) > { > struct shrinker_info *new, *old; > struct mem_cgroup_per_node *pn; > @@ -240,12 +247,16 @@ static int expand_one_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, > if (!old) > return 0; > > + if (!need_expand(new_nr_max, old->map_nr_max)) > + return 0; > + > new = kvmalloc_node(sizeof(*new) + size, GFP_KERNEL, nid); > if (!new) > return -ENOMEM; > > new->nr_deferred = (atomic_long_t *)(new + 1); > new->map = (void *)new->nr_deferred + defer_size; > + new->map_nr_max = new_nr_max; > > /* map: set all old bits, clear all new bits */ > memset(new->map, (int)0xff, old_map_size); > @@ -295,6 +306,7 @@ int alloc_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) > } > info->nr_deferred = (atomic_long_t *)(info + 1); > info->map = (void *)info->nr_deferred + defer_size; > + info->map_nr_max = shrinker_nr_max; > rcu_assign_pointer(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info, info); > } > up_write(&shrinker_rwsem); > @@ -302,12 +314,6 @@ int alloc_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) > return ret; > } > > -static inline bool need_expand(int nr_max) > -{ > - return round_up(nr_max, BITS_PER_LONG) > > - round_up(shrinker_nr_max, BITS_PER_LONG); > -} > - > static int expand_shrinker_info(int new_id) > { > int ret = 0; > @@ -316,7 +322,7 @@ static int expand_shrinker_info(int new_id) > int old_map_size, old_defer_size = 0; > struct mem_cgroup *memcg; > > - if (!need_expand(new_nr_max)) > + if (!need_expand(new_nr_max, shrinker_nr_max)) > goto out; > > if (!root_mem_cgroup) > @@ -332,7 +338,8 @@ static int expand_shrinker_info(int new_id) > memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, NULL, NULL); > do { > ret = expand_one_shrinker_info(memcg, map_size, defer_size, > - old_map_size, old_defer_size); > + old_map_size, old_defer_size, > + new_nr_max); > if (ret) { > mem_cgroup_iter_break(NULL, memcg); > goto out; > @@ -432,7 +439,7 @@ void reparent_shrinker_deferred(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) > for_each_node(nid) { > child_info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid); > parent_info = shrinker_info_protected(parent, nid); > - for (i = 0; i < shrinker_nr_max; i++) { > + for (i = 0; i < child_info->map_nr_max; i++) { > nr = atomic_long_read(&child_info->nr_deferred[i]); > atomic_long_add(nr, &parent_info->nr_deferred[i]); > } > @@ -899,7 +906,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid, > if (unlikely(!info)) > goto unlock; > > - for_each_set_bit(i, info->map, shrinker_nr_max) { > + for_each_set_bit(i, info->map, info->map_nr_max) { > struct shrink_control sc = { > .gfp_mask = gfp_mask, > .nid = nid, -- Thanks, Qi