Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763984AbXIKNCY (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:02:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933522AbXIKNB7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:01:59 -0400 Received: from home.nigel.suspend2.net ([203.171.70.205]:53111 "EHLO home.nigel.suspend2.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933343AbXIKNB6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:01:58 -0400 From: Nigel Cunningham Reply-To: nigel@suspend2.net To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix failure to resume from initrds. Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:01:51 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070831.706792) Cc: nigel@suspend2.net, LKML , Linus Torvalds References: <200709111354.25689.nigel@nigel.suspend2.net> <200709112127.58597.ncunningham@crca.org.au> <200709111355.07369.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <200709111355.07369.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709112301.52724.nigel@nigel.suspend2.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1680 Lines: 50 Hi again. On Tuesday 11 September 2007 21:55:06 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 13:27, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Tuesday 11 September 2007 21:04:22 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 05:54, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > > > Hi all. > > > > > > > > Commit 831441862956fffa17b9801db37e6ea1650b0f69 (Freezer: make kernel > > threads > > > > nonfreezable by default) breaks freezing when attempting to resume from an > > > > initrd, because the init (which is freezeable) spins while waiting for > > another > > > > thread to run /linuxrc, but doesn't check whether it has been told to > > enter > > > > the refrigerator. > > > > > > Hm. > > > > > > I use a resume from an initrd on a regular basis and it works without the > > patch > > > below. > > > > > > I think we need to investigate what happens in your test case a bit. > > > > Ah. That makes me realise that I see that too - my AMD64 uniprocessor laptop > > didn't need the patch (guess that's why I didn't notice the need and ack'd > > the patch). But my x86 SMP machine... it needs this. I'll see if they're > > running on different processors. > > Well, strange. My x86_64 SMP machines don't need the patch too. Oh well. I'm probably doing something wrong then and haven't clicked yet. Regards, Nigel -- See http://www.tuxonice.net for Howtos, FAQs, mailing lists, wiki and bugzilla info. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/