Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:01:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:01:36 -0500 Received: from mailgate.bodgit-n-scarper.com ([62.49.233.146]:58630 "HELO mould.bodgit-n-scarper.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:01:26 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:07:17 +0000 From: Matt To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: aacraid success with 2.4.17-pre8. Intentional? Message-ID: <20011211150717.A20308@mould.bodgit-n-scarper.com> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.2.20 on i686 SMP (mould) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I've been trying to set up an HP NetRaid 4M controller, (aacraid), and I got the familiar fsck hang with both the latest drivers provided by Matt Domsch, and Alan Cox, under kernel 2.4.16. I've just tried the latest 2.4.17-pre8 kernel, and it works, in that it gets passed the fsck'ing. I couldn't see anything in the changelog that screamed "Fix fsck hang with aacraid", so I was wondering if my working setup is intentional or not? I haven't followed the development of this driver too closely, I just had the card and downloaded the latest "stable" release and went from there... Searching the archives, I couldn't see anyone reporting a success with this kernel and card combination, which worried me slightly. Have I got something that will fall over if I sneeze near it? :-) Cheers Matt -- "Phase plasma rifle in a forty-watt range?" "Only what you see on the shelves, buddy" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/