Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18459C6FA8E for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2023 02:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229574AbjBZB6a (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Feb 2023 20:58:30 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58482 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229504AbjBZB62 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Feb 2023 20:58:28 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAA4BCA3A for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 17:58:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id h8so91081plf.10 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 17:58:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oo3uPGqFe9qxhSafXTbcqHa1iqkVF6jZJyZwrrstAQQ=; b=bzH3XZ+CPyGFOwbYWMzFz0HdwaNyI7+MKGARhjTvB28cgdTFj/Y51mJ2DufNv0GZvD PR8k/F29kZ5owkP8h2SSKsnw8jQOPAMRnIkPhUyD8plxD/TrxaekuS6FIxMPtkNncBN6 MfjWOCy5/6HpHPeqps6YOd1sxbfQLiElYHYLzinITBJIFMwpakf63BL1G3YQC1ptnqjo rdoI+oIy00xXzgVI27RrWciOIb55ExN1SfNxmtVjHU4zY/YnC44DdAjhQC9CL3XsBtE/ 8PqCpON/A6lrQpqNU5hcGdAWujZtYyUVFGBJEndKat5zcnNTby1rusD12pEetcH4Ce68 DJ5A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oo3uPGqFe9qxhSafXTbcqHa1iqkVF6jZJyZwrrstAQQ=; b=n7VKB9YzHwN9+LugXH1hS8TsnSP8XjR/uQUyEfTrOR8W1tUkAxHFq+DQD2oGzJhYad STFvbF9ku8XLv8nBGMdyWFBPmm9KGbCl7RQnCnpJpu2EZQSiZWB3/wFfYjJ+EvX4bl/H WE63h3VBGwQ13xva0HWUFBK1PWzMqAYODHnJ4Ax/wOQX61btMrhtc/7uFTQ0PMjyNejC qWvP6LC1aTCTjw+1Dc9lvpGaMImvxUJLlO/22O6KtCemRO9Dbc23HvPSiioKOkzDl1Ak nSq7H9PkWA8DdqDlXDzinTJkzufZXaxHm+Wkj46OP8SzT2ckSA99anwMI2nj6arSx/Pm IV0A== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVGimU6jaW4bkmUyoUdrf14Qrcd3yLA9t6FIN+kB8bbD+QVA8to 8a28ZxYZXztH1+e47tdxiaAcg4gtLvU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+gjq08m3bAEEdl66LVIgBE0mxVxbAO9s09vw4iXzMNw7nNTA/Ua3M0QTRvX6I2stXG/JIvkg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:3943:b0:cc:a8d7:ad62 with SMTP id r3-20020a056a20394300b000cca8d7ad62mr6153082pzg.27.1677376706971; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 17:58:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2600:8802:b00:4a48:1c16:31cb:9a06:c73e? ([2600:8802:b00:4a48:1c16:31cb:9a06:c73e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b11-20020aa7810b000000b005d72e54a7e1sm1710413pfi.215.2023.02.25.17.58.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 25 Feb 2023 17:58:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <0fa79232-18f7-af96-e116-a71b735a903d@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2023 17:58:24 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 Subject: Re: Raspberry Pi 4B: Failed to create device link with soc:firmware:gpio Content-Language: en-US To: Saravana Kannan Cc: Stefan Wahren , linux-arm-kernel , Linux Kernel , Android Kernel Team References: <03b70a8a-0591-f28b-a567-9d2f736f17e5@gmail.com> From: Florian Fainelli In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/25/2023 4:01 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 7:38 AM Florian Fainelli wrote: >> >> Hi Saravana, >> >> Using v6.2-10217-ga93e884edf61v my Raspberry Pi 4B issues the following >> for the "extended GPIO" provider: >> >> [ 5.969855] uart-pl011 fe201000.serial: Failed to create device link >> with soc:firmware:gpio > > Outside of this error, is it actually breaking anything? There is just this warning, there does not appear to be a functional issue. > Also, can you > pull in this patch and tell me what it says? I want to know what the > flags are. > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230225064148.274376-1-saravanak@google.com/ > > Can you also change every pr_debug and dev_dbg in drivers/base/core.c > to an info and then give me the logs as an attachment? Sure will do. > >> The kernel configuration I am using can be found here: >> >> https://gist.github.com/ffainelli/4eb83740c25b10f75b54560f8c8febb1 >> >> And the DTS is arch/arm*/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-4-b.dts > > Ah, is this yet another case of a DTS that's not upstream? Don't > worry, I'll still look at it as it might point to some existing > upstream issue too. This is with the upstream DTS file under that directory, I used * to denote that this was used equally for both arm and arm64. Thanks! -- Florian