Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11841C7EE23 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2023 14:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230392AbjBZOxw (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2023 09:53:52 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44776 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230208AbjBZOxL (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2023 09:53:11 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x632.google.com (mail-pl1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::632]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE4E91A4A4 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2023 06:49:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x632.google.com with SMTP id i3so4209103plg.6 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2023 06:49:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bytedance.com; s=google; t=1677422902; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=xJVL9LTM3YR7R2xJV6pOC5vrFajMNWUdaUGoIRklN4g=; b=ALVQXXOfu8Q3gVhZC/7gcT/As/x0PQNyX2nqdY6UDPAFzmCXukW/onK5TzeE9pcwvk vXJzQkiBP+sXbTYXsw+HpB7JRRbrwmsjkOEq5DQ1S1Eac1N0S/0/DsgoqOjYjHQYnPSR P4R9Pfo0jggo+dcJDr8XJLDD9doWZVqghSIkea6uqcKjvoOktQF/G7VDIKPmpqIX0uaq CUp5L8HF8li82mResfb29HBRedCwzzg7BH3UMRf7q7wMBQ/7+ybQtKL36gQDJZu0gwHP FCqtYPLddEJNMwfVTwEbd49hBEqsrqinMleX5XcFcj1s7BFSCNs7Wfig3bKPX0H4mz4V BKmQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1677422902; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xJVL9LTM3YR7R2xJV6pOC5vrFajMNWUdaUGoIRklN4g=; b=kx69l754ul2Sqs4Xs1g0SDtaTzNs2jNSxZqK9n+D2Zq0rrLCiVbdckVUIiuaRFhYTN c8QFmWshy3iFhhmzlXyLSlk/1fDoNOiHxW1+vHbc0iCpx2Dw+x4OXTXVp0ukGQ7Ne5k+ UvS+k/AgAxDmhemEXQe8TrIZPkq5GXPe+2yQjS8UGeTOdJpV6Of0Tkv7eEIa/JVJeowc D/IDUbzatyVvj9Fe4I2YZ61IAo+6U8bnjnhFRtb7DREZowZN6A90cQ+HM+c9ovAbGL3G Cqxihy/TiyA0BK74Oj8KRH+jLbd2U0qomOvEVmdo+4hoFb32WNKseBr2FRxZqMd/znAt Vy5A== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKW0avX26tNNgSBfu+/wImHGDSfTj6u7rPky0oodb/epom0Yc/kc gxCwgvkCoE4L9SQdenslcYDjew== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+bbch+q47tvYRNxM7CkTvsssKUNlySDXHnmC0iMbwnLjHUXiyS9TSOg6OMzWfUw8IIF2O97w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e84b:b0:19a:7439:3e98 with SMTP id t11-20020a170902e84b00b0019a74393e98mr23301977plg.4.1677422901796; Sun, 26 Feb 2023 06:48:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([139.177.225.248]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y20-20020a170902ed5400b0019c2cf12d15sm2755589plb.116.2023.02.26.06.48.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 26 Feb 2023 06:48:21 -0800 (PST) From: Qi Zheng To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, tkhai@ya.ru, hannes@cmpxchg.org, shakeelb@google.com, mhocko@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, muchun.song@linux.dev, david@redhat.com, shy828301@gmail.com Cc: sultan@kerneltoast.com, dave@stgolabs.net, penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, paulmck@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qi Zheng Subject: [PATCH v3 2/8] mm: vmscan: make global slab shrink lockless Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 22:46:49 +0800 Message-Id: <20230226144655.79778-3-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) In-Reply-To: <20230226144655.79778-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> References: <20230226144655.79778-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The shrinker_rwsem is a global lock in shrinkers subsystem, it is easy to cause blocking in the following cases: a. the write lock of shrinker_rwsem was held for too long. For example, there are many memcgs in the system, which causes some paths to hold locks and traverse it for too long. (e.g. expand_shrinker_info()) b. the read lock of shrinker_rwsem was held for too long, and a writer came at this time. Then this writer will be forced to wait and block all subsequent readers. For example: - be scheduled when the read lock of shrinker_rwsem is held in do_shrink_slab() - some shrinker are blocked for too long. Like the case mentioned in the patchset[1]. Therefore, many times in history ([2],[3],[4],[5]), some people wanted to replace shrinker_rwsem reader with SRCU, but they all gave up because SRCU was not unconditionally enabled. But now, since commit 1cd0bd06093c ("rcu: Remove CONFIG_SRCU"), the SRCU is unconditionally enabled. So it's time to use SRCU to protect readers who previously held shrinker_rwsem. [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191129214541.3110-1-ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com/ [2]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/1437080113.3596.2.camel@stgolabs.net/ [3]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1510609063-3327-1-git-send-email-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp/ [4]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/153365347929.19074.12509495712735843805.stgit@localhost.localdomain/ [5]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210927074823.5825-1-sultan@kerneltoast.com/ Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng --- mm/vmscan.c | 27 +++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 546c07ccb3bc..2a21a84d3db1 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ static void set_task_reclaim_state(struct task_struct *task, LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list); DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem); +DEFINE_SRCU(shrinker_srcu); #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG static int shrinker_nr_max; @@ -706,7 +707,7 @@ void free_prealloced_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker) void register_shrinker_prepared(struct shrinker *shrinker) { down_write(&shrinker_rwsem); - list_add_tail(&shrinker->list, &shrinker_list); + list_add_tail_rcu(&shrinker->list, &shrinker_list); shrinker->flags |= SHRINKER_REGISTERED; shrinker_debugfs_add(shrinker); up_write(&shrinker_rwsem); @@ -760,13 +761,15 @@ void unregister_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker) return; down_write(&shrinker_rwsem); - list_del(&shrinker->list); + list_del_rcu(&shrinker->list); shrinker->flags &= ~SHRINKER_REGISTERED; if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE) unregister_memcg_shrinker(shrinker); debugfs_entry = shrinker_debugfs_remove(shrinker); up_write(&shrinker_rwsem); + synchronize_srcu(&shrinker_srcu); + debugfs_remove_recursive(debugfs_entry); kfree(shrinker->nr_deferred); @@ -786,6 +789,7 @@ void synchronize_shrinkers(void) { down_write(&shrinker_rwsem); up_write(&shrinker_rwsem); + synchronize_srcu(&shrinker_srcu); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(synchronize_shrinkers); @@ -996,6 +1000,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid, { unsigned long ret, freed = 0; struct shrinker *shrinker; + int srcu_idx; /* * The root memcg might be allocated even though memcg is disabled @@ -1007,10 +1012,10 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid, if (!mem_cgroup_disabled() && !mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)) return shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_mask, nid, memcg, priority); - if (!down_read_trylock(&shrinker_rwsem)) - goto out; + srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&shrinker_srcu); - list_for_each_entry(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list) { + list_for_each_entry_srcu(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list, + srcu_read_lock_held(&shrinker_srcu)) { struct shrink_control sc = { .gfp_mask = gfp_mask, .nid = nid, @@ -1021,19 +1026,9 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid, if (ret == SHRINK_EMPTY) ret = 0; freed += ret; - /* - * Bail out if someone want to register a new shrinker to - * prevent the registration from being stalled for long periods - * by parallel ongoing shrinking. - */ - if (rwsem_is_contended(&shrinker_rwsem)) { - freed = freed ? : 1; - break; - } } - up_read(&shrinker_rwsem); -out: + srcu_read_unlock(&shrinker_srcu, srcu_idx); cond_resched(); return freed; } -- 2.20.1