From:   Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc:     Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        GNU/Weeb Mailing List <gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] workqueue: Simplify a pr_warn() call in wq_select_unbound_cpu()
Date:   Sun, 26 Feb 2023 23:53:20 +0700
Message-Id: <20230226165321.24825-2-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230226165321.24825-1-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
References: <20230226165321.24825-1-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Use pr_warn_once() to achieve the same thing. It's simpler.

Signed-off-by: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index b8b541caed4854a4..3f1fabea000f4408 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1392,15 +1392,13 @@ static bool is_chained_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
  */
 static int wq_select_unbound_cpu(int cpu)
 {
-	static bool printed_dbg_warning;
 	int new_cpu;
 
 	if (likely(!wq_debug_force_rr_cpu)) {
 		if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, wq_unbound_cpumask))
 			return cpu;
-	} else if (!printed_dbg_warning) {
-		pr_warn("workqueue: round-robin CPU selection forced, expect performance impact\n");
-		printed_dbg_warning = true;
+	} else {
+		pr_warn_once("workqueue: round-robin CPU selection forced, expect performance impact\n");
 	}
 
 	if (cpumask_empty(wq_unbound_cpumask))
-- 
Ammar Faizi