Date:   Mon, 27 Feb 2023 09:15:58 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
To:     Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc:     Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Btrfs Mailing List <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Fsdevel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        GNU/Weeb Mailing List <gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] Documentation: btrfs: Document the influence
 of wq_cpu_set to thread_pool option
Message-ID: <Y/wSXlp3vTEA6eo3@debian.me>
References: <20230226162639.20559-1-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
 <20230226162639.20559-3-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fDFresKap0HjLffm"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230226162639.20559-3-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
Precedence: bulk


--fDFresKap0HjLffm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 11:26:39PM +0700, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> +        Since 6.5, if *wq_cpu_set* is set, the default value will be the=
 number of
> +        online CPUs in the CPU wq_cpu_set plus 2.
> +
 =20
Why will the behavior be introduced in such future version (6.5)?

--=20
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

--fDFresKap0HjLffm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYKAB0WIQSSYQ6Cy7oyFNCHrUH2uYlJVVFOowUCY/wSVgAKCRD2uYlJVVFO
o2EFAP9iZ+Zv1BNkYVDso1HKU2Uz0akR+IpxjX6+ElY9Si7A3QD/cgWI94cx9XeY
9eYiqqdMAPVW1tcwpYNSJXZVE4gCZQU=
=NmA9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--fDFresKap0HjLffm--