Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9675CC7EE23 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:03:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229930AbjB0QDK (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2023 11:03:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48666 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229652AbjB0QDI (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2023 11:03:08 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x22a.google.com (mail-oi1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D66AC10401; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 08:03:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id r40so4534231oiw.0; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 08:03:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wY4yELjMWXO6awZMb6iksWCV1+Ua72vr+LoFoZrRcNI=; b=Wu3M9Zzms7rB+HEmXw3QF/BbTf2J61E3ygv1I2NPKXWhU6GPjWdanJRLwrjvilBLtU Rr8pPHsfmuakydNlSkNpVsV/OXdx2qHJ98oo9UESdwofNhVwqDETfHpqTA+jL2rtvnQG ZL998qqpyJrLAoI46/gpTPTnGtU+40Ns+snV3S5UBbW6aVmPmmLKEACAkLdFMitVI2cT UaEAwGzxJggo1BVFPXSvwqr46NrRtzIZBcy8vTLvlECpchuvDpQXu3vpE5ijN0BPajb2 Bbnb3z0e0tk0KFw1w8RcqiM1bmvFixkVsAgTMVXokc61gDDiFFi+Np/z/s8u+dKHu2vU h5Kw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=wY4yELjMWXO6awZMb6iksWCV1+Ua72vr+LoFoZrRcNI=; b=sUXLyXQXcQqSEC4WAHzEKZSBCcyf3QxduvpLfHQkSrcatedqgDgyPyxkMyL9c7dKqF Mn/F2brmvNyeYv5GO8y2Hu8Z0mHbA2l46tZUgAg9tUKK6Xx90YwXr8PTdnNqfRVG5DTW ytAh0DUMH/UkIXtkYBgNgrheDYLOmUusgxooE7F2ls1tyKQUtr4quS2/UREBH37YKlUp vroYB74yJSZaq16+5j3KlvRSv1Ozk3BjP36PHD6l9af7wE5y4LeAw4owGKuUDyg0nNd3 iKJkEocpl0dZcAy19vk+AVwFYSA37B+KdPed0l5wDyfwG5O06aERr5eq3K0S7ss6gZ4Q SoEg== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKX2Mq8gHpCirfPAerKeGPbQ2N9l1XWDYMEM1eL5tetoyKMJTzQm dJn9uZTsWVTUpYfwdDAU6KDAz1tPI4j++kGMpns= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+ZmrR7I1biQluOEJBEn/C6gMWC4qCxUJpYC9xBJ6krD3818J7krK8txkEnXTIjVNWC1IBCWAlO2i4xZ5YiQm0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:d49:b0:37f:a2ad:6718 with SMTP id w9-20020a0568080d4900b0037fa2ad6718mr4518935oik.3.1677513786148; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 08:03:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230224233126.1936-1-gregory.price@memverge.com> <20230224233126.1936-3-gregory.price@memverge.com> In-Reply-To: <20230224233126.1936-3-gregory.price@memverge.com> From: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:02:54 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/3] ptrace,syscall_user_dispatch: checkpoint/restore support for SUD To: Gregory Price Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, avagin@gmail.com, peterz@infradead.org, luto@kernel.org, krisman@collabora.com, tglx@linutronix.de, corbet@lwn.net, shuah@kernel.org, Gregory Price Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Gragory, On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 23:40, Gregory Price wrote: > > Implement ptrace getter/setter interface for syscall user dispatch. > > These prctl settings are presently write-only, making it impossible to > implement transparent checkpoint/restore via software like CRIU. > > 'on_dispatch' field is not exposed because it is a kernel-internal > only field that cannot be 'true' when returning to userland. > > Signed-off-by: Gregory Price > --- [..] > +int syscall_user_dispatch_set_config(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long size, > + void __user *data) > +{ > + int rc; > + struct ptrace_sud_config cfg; > + > + if (size != sizeof(struct ptrace_sud_config)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if (copy_from_user(&cfg, data, sizeof(struct ptrace_sud_config))) > + return -EFAULT; It seems that the tool you want here would be copy_struct_from_user(), which is designed for extendable syscalls. Thanks, Dmitry