Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S281863AbRLKQcS>; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 11:32:18 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S281874AbRLKQcL>; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 11:32:11 -0500
Received: from mail.ccur.com ([208.248.32.212]:43022 "EHLO mail.ccur.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S281863AbRLKQb5>;
	Tue, 11 Dec 2001 11:31:57 -0500
Subject: Re: [RFC] Multiprocessor Control Interfaces
From: Jason Baietto <jason.baietto@ccur.com>
To: Tim Hockin <thockin@hockin.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <200112110138.fBB1cqS09363@www.hockin.org>
In-Reply-To: <200112110138.fBB1cqS09363@www.hockin.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release)
Date: 11 Dec 2001 11:31:47 -0500
Message-Id: <1008088311.16656.4.camel@soybean>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 2001-12-10 at 20:38, Tim Hockin wrote:
>
> http://www.hockin.org/~thockin/pset.   Not finished, but could be.

Yes, many similarities.  I like the idea of having a single system
call that provides so much multiprocessor control and information.
If such a system call was ever standardized upon, I would gladly
support it in my "run" tool, though I fear that it would always be
functionally limited without /proc present.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/