Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5612DC64ED6 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 05:35:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229582AbjB1Ffh convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:35:37 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52286 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229469AbjB1Ffe (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:35:34 -0500 Received: from fd01.gateway.ufhost.com (fd01.gateway.ufhost.com [61.152.239.71]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9479018B15 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 21:35:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from EXMBX165.cuchost.com (unknown [175.102.18.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "EXMBX165", Issuer "EXMBX165" (not verified)) by fd01.gateway.ufhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99BB24E3C9; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 13:35:27 +0800 (CST) Received: from EXMBX062.cuchost.com (172.16.6.62) by EXMBX165.cuchost.com (172.16.6.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.42; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 13:33:33 +0800 Received: from EXMBX066.cuchost.com (172.16.7.66) by EXMBX062.cuchost.com (172.16.6.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.42; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 13:33:33 +0800 Received: from EXMBX066.cuchost.com ([fe80::5947:9245:907e:339f]) by EXMBX066.cuchost.com ([fe80::5947:9245:907e:339f%17]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.044; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 13:33:32 +0800 From: JeeHeng Sia To: Andrew Jones CC: "paul.walmsley@sifive.com" , "palmer@dabbelt.com" , "aou@eecs.berkeley.edu" , "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Leyfoon Tan , Mason Huo Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 4/4] RISC-V: Add arch functions to support hibernation/suspend-to-disk Thread-Topic: [PATCH v4 4/4] RISC-V: Add arch functions to support hibernation/suspend-to-disk Thread-Index: AQHZRZ0zqkG7/pRhhEiAX6gFjug0Aa7cUgAAgAEC65D///aKAIAAiLXg//+GvACAAI+BwP//lVOAAJFkcXD//+axAP//cjXQgADMoID//pX2AIACjLaA//93Q9A= Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 05:33:32 +0000 Message-ID: <803ac603023c4eeda4a0b8e414cce6f1@EXMBX066.cuchost.com> References: <20230224090010.nmy6latszfkdqcft@orel> <9cfd485d1e0d46cdb1323bb6ea330f6e@EXMBX066.cuchost.com> <20230224095526.ctctpzw3p3csf6qj@orel> <24a6dbe6aa2043c7812bf7e258786e13@EXMBX066.cuchost.com> <20230224120715.wgqnqmkadsbqusus@orel> <180fda36f9974809b436c52e4b3eda58@EXMBX066.cuchost.com> <20230227075942.rgl4hqnwttwvoroe@orel> <178ca008701147828d2e62402ff4f78a@EXMBX066.cuchost.com> <20230227114435.eow57ax5zhysz3kv@orel> <20230228050457.zfbflfawctaccepv@orel> In-Reply-To: <20230228050457.zfbflfawctaccepv@orel> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [202.188.176.82] x-yovoleruleagent: yovoleflag Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Jones > Sent: Tuesday, 28 February, 2023 1:05 PM > To: JeeHeng Sia > Cc: paul.walmsley@sifive.com; palmer@dabbelt.com; aou@eecs.berkeley.edu; linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org; Leyfoon Tan ; Mason Huo > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] RISC-V: Add arch functions to support hibernation/suspend-to-disk > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 01:32:53AM +0000, JeeHeng Sia wrote: > > > > > > load image; > > > > > > loop: Create pbe chain, return error if failed; > > > > > > > > > > This loop pseudocode is incomplete. It's > > > > > > > > > > loop: > > > > > if (swsusp_page_is_forbidden(page) && swsusp_page_is_free(page)) > > > > > return page_address(page); > > > > > Create pbe chain, return error if failed; > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > which I pointed out explicitly in my last reply. Also, as I asked in my > > > > > last reply (and have been asking four times now, albeit less explicitly > > > > > the first two times), how do we know at least one PBE will be linked? > > > > 1 PBE correspond to 1 page, you shouldn't expect only 1 page is saved. > > > > > > I know PBEs correspond to pages. *Why* should I not expect only one page > > > is saved? Or, more importantly, why should I expect more than zero pages > > > are saved? > > > > > > Convincing answers might be because we *always* put the restore code in > > > pages which get added to the PBE list or that the original page tables > > > *always* get put in pages which get added to the PBE list. It's not very > > > convincing to simply *assume* that at least one random page will always > > > meet the PBE list criteria. > > > > > > > Hibernation core will do the calculation. If the PBEs (restore_pblist) linked successfully, the hibernated image will be restore else > > > normal boot will take place. > > > > > Or, even more specifically this time, where is the proof that for each > > > > > hibernation resume, there exists some page such that > > > > > !swsusp_page_is_forbidden(page) or !swsusp_page_is_free(page) is true? > > > > forbidden_pages and free_pages are not contributed to the restore_pblist (as you already aware from the code). Infact, the > > > forbidden_pages and free_pages are not save into the disk. > > > > > > Exactly, so those pages are *not* going to contribute to the greater than > > > zero pages. What I've been asking for, from the beginning, is to know > > > which page(s) are known to *always* contribute to the list. Or, IOW, how > > > do you know the PBE list isn't empty, a.k.a restore_pblist isn't NULL? > > Well, this is keep going around in a circle, thought the answer is in the hibernation code. restore_pblist get the pointer from the PBE, > and the PBE already checked for validity. > > It keeps going around in circles because you keep avoiding my question by > pointing out trivial linked list code. I'm not worried about the linked > list code being correct. My concern is that you're using a linked list > with an assumption that it is not empty. My question has been all along, > how do you know it's not empty? > > I'll change the way I ask this time. Please take a look at your PBE list > and let me know if there are PBEs on it that must be there on each > hibernation resume, e.g. the resume code page is there or whatever. > > > Can I suggest you to submit a patch to the hibernation core? > > Why? What's wrong with it? Kindly let me draw 2 scenarios for you. Option 1 is to add the restore_pblist checking to the hibernation core and option 2 is to add restore_pblist checking to the arch solution Although I really don't think it is needed. But if you really wanted to add the checking, I would suggest to go with option 1. again, I really think that it is not needed! //Option 1 //Pseudocode to illustrate the image loading initialize restore_pblist to null; initialize safe_pages_list to null; Allocate safe page list, return error if failed; load image; loop: Create pbe chain, return error if failed; assign orig_addr and safe_page to pbe; link pbe to restore_pblist; /* Add checking here */ return error if restore_pblist equal to null; return pbe to handle->buffer; check handle->buffer; goto loop if no error else return with error; //option 2 //Pseudocode to illustrate the image loading initialize restore_pblist to null; initialize safe_pages_list to null; Allocate safe page list, return error if failed; load image; loop: Create pbe chain, return error if failed; assign orig_addr and safe_page to pbe; link pbe to restore_pblist; return pbe to handle->buffer; check handle->buffer; goto loop if no error else return with error; everything works correctly, continue the rest of the operation invoke swsusp_arch_resume //@swsusp_arch_resume() loop2: return error if restore_pblist is null increment restore_pblist and goto loop2 create temp_pg_table continue the rest of the resume operation > > Thanks, > drew