MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230214103936.1061078-1-sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>
 <20230214103936.1061078-3-sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> <20230214151101.GB742354@roeck-us.net>
 <CAMhs-H915iSR7TpuXdcg8NKLV8Scv9cwW36SZaXNK839kA4ybg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMhs-H_Ce-+MFi5zTMg8v8dSSg5ioaTy+Pw-0QMgK++PVtEViQ@mail.gmail.com> <20230228083920.GA5801@alpha.franken.de>
In-Reply-To: <20230228083920.GA5801@alpha.franken.de>
From:   Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Feb 2023 09:51:17 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMhs-H8xGjGs0-qvxb5KgQ3YZw=2=scqaY15K3ZRp50jQcncSg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: rename watchdog node
 from 'wdt' into 'watchdog'
To:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
        wim@linux-watchdog.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
        arinc.unal@arinc9.com, p.zabel@pengutronix.de,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu=2DDaud=C3=A9?= <philmd@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:41 AM Thomas Bogendoerfer
<tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 05:44:21AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 4:12 PM Sergio Paracuellos
> > <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 4:11 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wr=
ote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:39:33AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> > > > > Watchdog nodes must use 'watchdog' for node name. When a 'make dt=
bs_check'
> > > > > is performed the following warning appears:
> > > > >
> > > > > wdt@100: $nodename:0: 'wdt@100' does not match '^watchdog(@.*|-[0=
-9a-f])?$'
> > > > >
> > > > > Fix this warning up properly renaming the node into 'watchdog'.
> > > > >
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Ar=C4=B1n=C3=A7 =C3=9CNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 <philmd@linaro.org>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > > >
> > > > Note that we can not apply this and the next patch of the series
> > > > through the watchdog tree since it crosses a maintainer boundary.
> > >
> > > I was expecting Thomas to get these two arch/mips patches or get an
> > > Acked-by from him in order for you to apply them.
> >
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > I think you have missed this series since you have started to apply
> > newer stuff in mips-next. Are you ok with taking or Acking patches 2
> > and 3 of this series?
>
> yes, I sort of missed it. If it's enough to take patch 2/3 I'll do that.
> If it's better to keep the series, I'm also ok with acking them.
> What's the best way forward ?

Both trees work for me. The rest of the patches of this series should
go through the watchdog tree. Guenter, what is better for you?

Thanks,
    Sergio Paracuellos

>
> Thomas.
>
> --
> Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessaril=
y a
> good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 =
]