Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B5BC7EE2E for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 12:10:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231575AbjB1MK2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2023 07:10:28 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37800 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229623AbjB1MK0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2023 07:10:26 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85FA81D910; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 04:10:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id cq23so39081704edb.1; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 04:10:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id:date:subject:mime-version :from:content-transfer-encoding:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=XzGiX5oItZA3FXYXirsZd2ttUBOvOMFOuarqaBNhpNE=; b=YdXywtUBYefrWb0SAhAESxZVRE1cgk/LE/PzB5T0DXIMjAKwetyl5RF1hu/R1XOVww v0l3U7xuMU2QjRGctTlxlzG3CIGtBLHMQJZM4YfkFMNpexashSxqmDLUK96aq/QeAvvX LkUInkorD7+J3a5iJow90ReXRvMsUK/O1hRWd+J4M3KAkYLSRwkLSCXgcQSqOhIT+x2N Xs0y67nTUYrOf8Q8ExTSCsHVch6QHkRl77W1Jne3YtpR//nQc65sh5zwQMvqvWF9NPGB UmqoAsizpuAvb9obiuMWIcKarcOStf8RRdjismZ+BFSAJ8WUiGZ6fpr9IZ9TG7yZj6He CcUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id:date:subject:mime-version :from:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XzGiX5oItZA3FXYXirsZd2ttUBOvOMFOuarqaBNhpNE=; b=Vrt8tCtL+W1TtqeafP6mx8cqEjjetci73j+NCYKe/Ivx6Ii35gv51yBdb4g7jK8aG7 r/hYNoJmlaesR1bloPjXEF7662OQ224juX5fa0SqPgGzyxgLo0JsT4JNKxf/ZuQ/jw0m BpjtOY0mrbHuzcNckqZ3I4JySZv99rgNFzgrDY0D25I5t+zZZnwGWiJzDX4iX0XZiND8 krtebBt2HFPqH91HG879Tj+9hJd/m9K10uXAsyuYJu+HwFpM7LvIbnv7bprLAqzzsY4j 29ug/xL4gUP1/SXDMs5uh64pXmFjGxfLzlOVov6YXW+Z/gIMjU4iUEIaT+hTjBcN+QS5 EPuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKW3hUgN8k5bPqFYgkwVW5rMH2WJRK+9d45Cc4oHKiGmX7PWi2F3 Go5yVpKA2ypktDjAiQqWhNs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/uKluGfXdjIfoZg+D9ARlvY6PEJqaSoRNvczp7EGvTKSzakcyzPGj0PbASt3rv7RR4YLQxkA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:25c2:b0:8e1:12b6:a8fc with SMTP id ae2-20020a17090725c200b008e112b6a8fcmr2729860ejc.4.1677586223873; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 04:10:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpclient.apple ([45.86.200.169]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id le13-20020a170907170d00b008c44438734csm4482570ejc.113.2023.02.28.04.10.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Feb 2023 04:10:23 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A9_Koerkamp?= Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [regression] Bug 216946 - Toshiba satellite click mini l9w-b: touchscreen: no touch events with kernel 6.1.4 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 13:10:11 +0100 Message-Id: <15A82C8F-324B-4E99-B388-27F1480B7959@gmail.com> References: Cc: Jiri Kosina , Benjamin Tissoires , Dmitry Torokhov , "open list:HID CORE LAYER" , LKML In-Reply-To: To: Linux regressions mailing list X-Mailer: iPad Mail (20C65) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, additionally, I searched for any reported SIS0817 issues, yet did not find a= ny. But perhaps it rings a bell. Cheers - G=C3=A9 On 28 Feb 2023, at 12:32, Thorsten Leemhuis wrot= e: =EF=BB=BFOn 19.01.23 16:06, Linux kernel regression tracking (Thorsten Leemh= uis) wrote: > Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker. >=20 > I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org. As many (most?) > kernel developer don't keep an eye on it, I decided to forward it by > mail. Quoting from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216946 : The reporter recently confirmed in the ticket that the issue still happens with 6.2. There wasn't any reply from any of the input developers here or in bugzilla afaics. :-/ Hmmm. Could someone from that camp maybe please take a minute and at least briefly look into this as answer something like "that might be due to a problem in subsystem 'foo'", "maybe ask bar for an option", or "we have no idea what might cause this, this needs to be bisected"? That would help a lot. Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page. #regzbot poke >> G=C3=A9 Koerkamp 2023-01-17 20:21:51 UTC >>=20 >> Created attachment 303619 [details] >> Kernel configuration for v6.1.4/ journalctl (dmesg)/ ACPIdump/lsmod >>=20 >> Overview:=20 >> The touchscreen does not react on touch events. >> Touchscreen display and touchpad are working. >>=20 >> Step to reproduce: >> Open any UI page >> Try to use touch on relevant UI controls (buttons etc.) >>=20 >> Result: >> No reaction on screen touches >>=20 >> Expected result: >> Reaction on touched control, same as when using the touch pad or connecte= d mouse (which do work). >>=20 >> Build information: >> The error happens with kernel version 6.1.4 >> After rebuilding with different kernel versions, it appears that it first= fails with kernel 5.16 >>=20 >> Additional builds: >> The click mini l9w-b still works with kernel 5.10.y LTS and 5.15.y LTS. >>=20 >> Important remark: >> Touchscreen still works fine with kernel 6.1.4 using =20 >> - an HP x2 detachable 10-p0xx or >> - a Lenovo yoga 520-14ikb >>=20 >> So it could be a hardware dependent issue >=20 > See the ticket for more details. >=20 >=20 > [TLDR for the rest of this mail: I'm adding this report to the list of > tracked Linux kernel regressions; the text you find below is based on a > few templates paragraphs you might have encountered already in similar > form.] >=20 > BTW, let me use this mail to also add the report to the list of tracked > regressions to ensure it's doesn't fall through the cracks: >=20 > #regzbot introduced: v5.15..v5.16 > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216946 > #regzbot title: hid: touchscreen broken with Toshiba satellite click > mini l9w-b > #regzbot ignore-activity >=20 > This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already > discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when > the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or > something else totally wrong? Then just reply and tell me -- ideally > while also telling regzbot about it, as explained by the page listed in > the footer of this mail. >=20 > Developers: When fixing the issue, remember to add 'Link:' tags pointing > to the report (e.g. the buzgzilla ticket and maybe this mail as well, if > this thread sees some discussion). See page linked in footer for details. >=20 > Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) > -- > Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: > https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr > If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.