Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D4CC64EC7 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 16:55:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229923AbjB1QzP (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2023 11:55:15 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47642 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230377AbjB1QzK (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2023 11:55:10 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D87AB360B8 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 08:54:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1677603174; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zCkSECvXS7yB7KD0+uxNsAJHsyUzclFZ5TPFGlTqNhA=; b=LYHDI7T2KgArZmWGQD/n69LhteayWHvk+RbPkFPv8YYiyoEV17qYo7jseMwDlSi/vEYPzI O0pFmalruQukwFSLEAZ9oqBaXU/VGo4OMT/vqTh6zbdZLYHjX/Ms3HtRvPypfYly5joutM UKVjD3zj+8w0VNN2fHs8xC/tK6Fr6UQ= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-605-7BXfBiSpNsaGYExb4C9rcw-1; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 11:52:51 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 7BXfBiSpNsaGYExb4C9rcw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA670811E9C; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 16:52:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.45.226.252]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C9D3018EC6; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 16:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 oleg@redhat.com; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 17:52:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 17:52:40 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com> Cc: Gregory Price , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, avagin@gmail.com, peterz@infradead.org, luto@kernel.org, krisman@collabora.com, tglx@linutronix.de, corbet@lwn.net, shuah@kernel.org, Gregory Price Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/3] ptrace,syscall_user_dispatch: checkpoint/restore support for SUD Message-ID: <20230228165217.GA16798@redhat.com> References: <20230224233126.1936-1-gregory.price@memverge.com> <20230224233126.1936-3-gregory.price@memverge.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.5 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/27, Dmitry Safonov wrote: > > > +int syscall_user_dispatch_set_config(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long size, > > + void __user *data) > > +{ > > + int rc; > > + struct ptrace_sud_config cfg; > > + > > + if (size != sizeof(struct ptrace_sud_config)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if (copy_from_user(&cfg, data, sizeof(struct ptrace_sud_config))) > > + return -EFAULT; > > It seems that the tool you want here would be copy_struct_from_user(), > which is designed for extendable syscalls. Hmm. Why? In this case ksize == usize, so why do we need copy_struct_from_user ? Oleg.