From:   Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
To:     <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     <davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
        <pabeni@redhat.com>, <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
        Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] net: lan966x: Fix port police support using tc-matchall
Date:   Tue, 28 Feb 2023 21:47:42 +0100
Message-ID: <20230228204742.2599151-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

When the police was removed from the port, then it was trying to
remove the police from the police id and not from the actual
police index.
The police id represents the id of the police and police index
represents the position in HW where the police is situated.
The port police id can be any number while the port police index
is a number based on the port chip port.
Fix this by deleting the police from HW that is situated at the
police index and not police id.

Fixes: 5390334b59a3 ("net: lan966x: Add port police support using tc-matchall")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_police.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_police.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_police.c
index a9aec900d608d..7d66fe75cd3bf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_police.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_police.c
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ int lan966x_police_port_del(struct lan966x_port *port,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	err = lan966x_police_del(port, port->tc.police_id);
+	err = lan966x_police_del(port, POL_IDX_PORT + port->chip_port);
 	if (err) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
 				   "Failed to add policer to port");
-- 
2.38.0