Message-ID: <04213fad-909f-e86d-caaa-c559917b2e4d@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Feb 2023 22:05:25 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.13.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] KVM: Change return type of kvm_arch_vm_ioctl() to
 "int"
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To:     kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc:     kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
        Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
        Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
References: <20230208140105.655814-1-thuth@redhat.com>
 <20230208140105.655814-7-thuth@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230208140105.655814-7-thuth@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 08/02/2023 15.01, Thomas Huth wrote:
> All kvm_arch_vm_ioctl() implementations now only deal with "int"
> types as return values, so we can change the return type of these
> functions to use "int" instead of "long".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c       | 3 +--
>   arch/mips/kvm/mips.c       | 4 ++--
>   arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 5 ++---
>   arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c        | 3 +--
>   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c   | 3 +--
>   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c         | 3 +--
>   include/linux/kvm_host.h   | 3 +--
>   7 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Ping!

Unless I missed something, I think this series had enough review ... Paolo, 
could you maybe queue the whole series, since it's mostly an 
architecture-wide clean up?

  Thanks,
   Thomas