Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933416AbXILI7Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2007 04:59:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762213AbXILI7E (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2007 04:59:04 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.174]:64867 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753268AbXILI7A (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2007 04:59:00 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/15] Use spufs_coredump_num_notes everywhere, and don't NULL terminate Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 10:55:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070831.706792) Cc: Michael Ellerman , Jeremy Kerr , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <2900ea4dbfd6e98e71ff400cbd25d1283a278972.1189583010.git.michael@ellerman.id.au> <163f3c08c2c47d47103f234d6caa517ed9a44036.1189583010.git.michael@ellerman.id.au> In-Reply-To: <163f3c08c2c47d47103f234d6caa517ed9a44036.1189583010.git.michael@ellerman.id.au> X-Face: >j"dOR3XO=^3iw?0`(E1wZ/&le9!.ok[JrI=S~VlsF~}"P\+jx.GT@=?utf-8?q?=0A=09-oaEG?=,9Ba>v;3>:kcw#yO5?B:l{(Ln.2)=?utf-8?q?=27=7Dfw07+4-=26=5E=7CScOpE=3F=5D=5EXdv=5B/zWkA7=60=25M!DxZ=0A=09?= =?utf-8?q?8MJ=2EU5?="hi+2yT(k`PF~Zt;tfT,i,JXf=x@eLP{7B:"GyA\=UnN) =?utf-8?q?=26=26qdaA=3A=7D-Y*=7D=3A3YvzV9=0A=09=7E=273a=7E7I=7CWQ=5D?=<50*%U-6Ewmxfzdn/CK_E/ouMU(r?FAQG/ev^JyuX.%(By`" =?utf-8?q?L=5F=0A=09H=3Dbj?=)"y7*XOqz|SS"mrZ$`Q_syCd MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709121055.40170.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/kjOxXFA+fh+O3UCtJbhr3g2EG+pyscXjGqzT kudzUGlGpKRH4n6QlKVGHWYevR6rb6yqEzKjNc5Egnl8Kzmjp8 Nppda2ckxUoRsmR29iBlw== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 710 Lines: 15 On Wednesday 12 September 2007, Michael Ellerman wrote: > The spufs_coredump_read array is NULL terminated, and we also store the size. > We only need one or the other, and storing the size should save a teensy bit > of memory vs NULL terminating, so do that. Given that we have another array in there with almost the same contents and that is NULL terminated, I'd vote for doing it the other way and also use NULL-termination instead of the count here. Arnd <>< - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/