Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933858AbXILJae (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2007 05:30:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763465AbXILJaZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2007 05:30:25 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:58794 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764110AbXILJaY (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2007 05:30:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 10:30:20 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Paul Mundt , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] fs: define file_fsync() even for CONFIG_BLOCK=n Message-ID: <20070912093020.GB32511@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Paul Mundt , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20070912020610.GA26827@linux-sh.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070912020610.GA26827@linux-sh.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 553 Lines: 12 On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:06:10AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > There's nothing that is problematic for file_fsync() with CONFIG_BLOCK=n, > and it's built in unconditionally anyways, so move the prototype out to > reflect that. Without this, the unionfs build bails out. Unionfs should stop using it instead. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/