Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C7CC7EE30 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2023 20:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229619AbjCAUH5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2023 15:07:57 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43764 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229498AbjCAUHy (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2023 15:07:54 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x836.google.com (mail-qt1-x836.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::836]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE4F22D47 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2023 12:07:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt1-x836.google.com with SMTP id d7so15648332qtr.12 for ; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 12:07:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cmpxchg-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; t=1677701272; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=EAcp6gwJPIpQSJ5evzEyfrtFkdf4nPPjMijC6R20IBI=; b=F3ZYH+5Px/N5yjWu3nYFhIw28OIIi3vK0lrj9VXXDVqd7nyUsmYzdUcZH15UNBaQ18 P6d3947mCJmysie/OTvSpOzJur1L4DsVnRqK+EK3L/lF/5CYUVYe00hr51kzsp7jplxy kFNIZzjVOyU/3/NXzrYxkfKTvB0l2OxAO78e/pq9VctGhD8PQPdAAc5gMoQ5P43g//Q+ WdSdzRPpLmumJRD5YsFiIFDMLyUDRZy2fhlbxZxoXeShB7UYoP4fVnfoWJeRtH8o2zXL oRn1MC0/8QMRNTvVSRsVqbt/Hwm831MREuiRJbleArO36wnUJHRYSvw/uyhNG04vl2t8 Azqg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1677701272; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=EAcp6gwJPIpQSJ5evzEyfrtFkdf4nPPjMijC6R20IBI=; b=fC25PcxJoHeu8gtbCqnvGzBiJK9jJqmz5I0Z858nlPH/+YnB27dnFQGXQk8KSU88QO eAz5gX1oL6DGdYRVnZeXTd4j0kS9BoBLqHx+vyPUMwmjHy2dFcgvRloMO5ICc+3or7nF BLriE0uvPDHlL18KL4zVVCv06mx1ZtZqHw2AGtURrHlgkYbS2gEVR+wnBEbjgZM7x69R CjSh9yOTbcxRihXrrF3Se3hQ3YiGuKJ4CAYFffac9nm5aUgoyOWhCp+i8G6kmRW4L7jF O/kSYbpcANIrJa7pl1oec/LFErIDEwixOjeQvTfFL+idQ7uJeQefgKnT4vum5EfN8VJB ax2w== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVT/CKcACmgivj+kh58bZ7L0gquBdkUv9TIgGtzFJTDHUtRw9mz YRZcD6RYl3LU8WwdJfBIiKeNTw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8fklZoidZ6wJPlErKN58Hjas3ZHyXPUbpl8sIiemNVnmVVNAxl92wHSOfvT9RXVfLNyf763g== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5a52:0:b0:3bf:d1b3:2be2 with SMTP id o18-20020ac85a52000000b003bfd1b32be2mr12989708qta.63.1677701272045; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 12:07:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2620:10d:c091:480::1:19d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q13-20020ac8450d000000b003bfad864e81sm8925102qtn.69.2023.03.01.12.07.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 01 Mar 2023 12:07:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 15:07:50 -0500 From: Johannes Weiner To: Suren Baghdasaryan Cc: tj@kernel.org, lizefan.x@bytedance.com, peterz@infradead.org, johunt@akamai.com, mhocko@suse.com, keescook@chromium.org, quic_sudaraja@quicinc.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] psi: remove 500ms min window size limitation for triggers Message-ID: References: <20230301193403.1507484-1-surenb@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230301193403.1507484-1-surenb@google.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 11:34:03AM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > Current 500ms min window size for psi triggers limits polling interval > to 50ms to prevent polling threads from using too much cpu bandwidth by > polling too frequently. However the number of cgroups with triggers is > unlimited, so this protection can be defeated by creating multiple > cgroups with psi triggers (triggers in each cgroup are served by a single > "psimon" kernel thread). > Instead of limiting min polling period, which also limits the latency of > psi events, it's better to limit psi trigger creation to authorized users > only, like we do for system-wide psi triggers (/proc/pressure/* files can > be written only by processes with CAP_SYS_RESOURCE capability). This also > makes access rules for cgroup psi files consistent with system-wide ones. > Add a CAP_SYS_RESOURCE capability check for cgroup psi file writers and > remove the psi window min size limitation. > > Suggested-by: Sudarshan Rajagopalan > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1676067791.git.quic_sudaraja@quicinc.com/ > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan > --- > kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 10 ++++++++++ > kernel/sched/psi.c | 4 +--- > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c > index 935e8121b21e..b600a6baaeca 100644 > --- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c > +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c > @@ -3867,6 +3867,12 @@ static __poll_t cgroup_pressure_poll(struct kernfs_open_file *of, > return psi_trigger_poll(&ctx->psi.trigger, of->file, pt); > } > > +static int cgroup_pressure_open(struct kernfs_open_file *of) > +{ > + return (of->file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE && !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) ? > + -EPERM : 0; > +} I agree with the change, but it's a bit unfortunate that this check is duplicated between system and cgroup. What do you think about psi_trigger_create() taking the file and checking FMODE_WRITE and CAP_SYS_RESOURCE against file->f_cred?