Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 13:45:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 13:45:02 -0500 Received: from mercury.Sun.COM ([192.9.25.1]:13504 "EHLO mercury.Sun.COM") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 13:44:58 -0500 Message-ID: <3C164D93.A52BC1C2@sun.com> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:16:51 -0800 From: Tim Hockin Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.12C5_V i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Baietto CC: Tim Hockin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Multiprocessor Control Interfaces In-Reply-To: <200112110138.fBB1cqS09363@www.hockin.org> <1008088311.16656.4.camel@soybean> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jason Baietto wrote: > > On Mon, 2001-12-10 at 20:38, Tim Hockin wrote: > > > > http://www.hockin.org/~thockin/pset. Not finished, but could be. > > Yes, many similarities. I like the idea of having a single system > call that provides so much multiprocessor control and information. > If such a system call was ever standardized upon, I would gladly > support it in my "run" tool, though I fear that it would always be > functionally limited without /proc present. Adding /proc/ interfaces like cpus_allowed or similar is just gravy on top of pset, which I think is a good interface. -- Tim Hockin Systems Software Engineer Sun Microsystems, Cobalt Server Appliances thockin@sun.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/