Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD870C7EE30 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2023 13:04:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229989AbjCBNEW (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2023 08:04:22 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35674 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229793AbjCBNET (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2023 08:04:19 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43B7919685; Thu, 2 Mar 2023 05:04:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1677762256; x=1709298256; h=message-id:date:mime-version:cc:subject:to:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3Jpg3nHjmpvS3lM/CU+kVN/GW52lIe3SiJrFpzxvyCg=; b=NZYJoglwCFY3uPjt5xO/p+Phnd8M8bcqfFSszGrb/k8FigslYIECeEsb 6hVL+UkeFcH6+mOgqlI9pflOvi8nCbaQ1HDMG1V16SnafKi8iyPuOocJC 0D+DrOKbef4bowufak+XZEQNsL5k121D5walfbMUJersPRhmrqfhyLjzM HfWsERNtbGZ7amcAevOqxQ+uJiz8S8i8ZCvkslHRkGqS6rKUV8f1A+Qdw aKzdzIplMfY0rT1dIjXMjXTlDBz6mBuO9u7anzVCGZTongDGRQ8alvmK5 c6L7m4DL9NXYm7WovSh3VHLm6+voiKG5HF49rcAfF1N+OE2T1UXEwiQ0o w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10636"; a="336213549" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,227,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="336213549" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Mar 2023 05:04:15 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10636"; a="818011391" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,227,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="818011391" Received: from blu2-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.254.214.218]) ([10.254.214.218]) by fmsmga001-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Mar 2023 05:04:09 -0800 Message-ID: <9663b2e8-6f5e-0da1-822d-20cdda130386@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 21:04:07 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Robin Murphy , Will Deacon , David Woodhouse , Raj Ashok , "Tian, Kevin" , Yi Liu , "Yu, Fenghua" , Dave Jiang , Kirill Shutemov Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] iommu/sva: Use GFP_KERNEL for pasid allocation Content-Language: en-US To: Jacob Pan , LKML , iommu@lists.linux.dev, Jason Gunthorpe , Joerg Roedel , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Dave Hansen , Thomas Gleixner , X86 Kernel , bp@alien8.de, "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , corbet@lwn.net, vkoul@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org References: <20230301235646.2692846-1-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <20230301235646.2692846-5-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> From: Baolu Lu In-Reply-To: <20230301235646.2692846-5-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2023/3/2 7:56, Jacob Pan wrote: > We’re not using spinlock-protected IOASID allocation anymore, there’s > no need for GFP_ATOMIC. > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu Best regards, baolu