Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762964AbXILTlS (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:41:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756982AbXILTlB (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:41:01 -0400 Received: from mailin.studentenwerk.mhn.de ([141.84.225.229]:44334 "EHLO email.studentenwerk.mhn.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756520AbXILTlA (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:41:00 -0400 From: Wolfgang Walter Organization: Studentenwerk =?iso-8859-1?q?M=FCnchen?= To: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [patch] sunrpc: make closing of old temporary sockets work (was: problems with lockd in 2.6.22.6) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 21:40:57 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: Neil Brown , trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, netdev@vger.kernel.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200709121407.11151.wolfgang.walter@studentenwerk.mhn.de> <18151.62510.891210.485277@notabene.brown> <20070912184222.GG4274@fieldses.org> In-Reply-To: <20070912184222.GG4274@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709122140.57783.wolfgang.walter@studentenwerk.mhn.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1418 Lines: 39 On Wednesday 12 September 2007, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 04:14:06PM +0200, Neil Brown wrote: > > So it is in 2.6.21 and later and should probably go to .stable for .21 > > and .22. > > > > Bruce: for you :-) > > OK, thanks! But, (as is alas often the case) I'm still confused: > > > if (!test_and_set_bit(SK_OLD, &svsk->sk_flags)) > > continue; > > - if (atomic_read(&svsk->sk_inuse) || test_bit(SK_BUSY, &svsk->sk_flags)) > > + if (atomic_read(&svsk->sk_inuse) > 1 > > + || test_bit(SK_BUSY, &svsk->sk_flags)) > > continue; > > atomic_inc(&svsk->sk_inuse); > > list_move(le, &to_be_aged); > > What is it that ensures svsk->sk_inuse isn't incremented or SK_BUSY set > after that test? Not all the code that does either of those is under > the same serv->sv_lock lock that this code is. > This should not matter - SK_CLOSED may be set at any time. svc_age_temp_sockets only detaches the socket, sets SK_CLOSED and then enqueues it. If SK_BUSY is set its already enqueued and svc_sock_enqueue ensures that it is not enqueued twice. Regards, -- Wolfgang Walter Studentenwerk M?nchen Anstalt des ?ffentlichen Rechts - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/