MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230302013822.1808711-1-sboyd@kernel.org> <20230302013822.1808711-2-sboyd@kernel.org>
 <CABVgOSkxOxpaHVtq1YpvNEshTZ3nic1p7NjV5DPdz066=tiS-A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABVgOSkxOxpaHVtq1YpvNEshTZ3nic1p7NjV5DPdz066=tiS-A@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date:   Fri, 3 Mar 2023 08:49:04 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVN=s-ytn03Kze5okA6rhzdWJ0cWxXV0vrtYXDvLoFMQw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: Add linux,kunit binding
To:     David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        patches@lists.linux.dev,
        Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
        Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
        Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Precedence: bulk

Hi David,

On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 8:16 AM David Gow <davidgow@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 09:38, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Document the linux,kunit board compatible string. This board is loaded
> > into the Linux kernel when KUnit is testing devicetree dependent code.
>
> As with the series as a whole, this might need to change a little bit
> if we want to either use devicetree overlays and/or other
> architectures.
>
> That being said, I'm okay with having this until then: the only real
> topic for bikeshedding is the name.
> - Is KUnit best as a board name, or part of the vendor name?
> - Do we want to include the architecture in the name?
> Should it be "linux,kunit", "linux-kunit,uml", "linux,kunit-uml", etc?

I would not include an architecture (or virtualization method), as
this is independent of the architecture or virtualization method.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds