Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F9AC64EC4 for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 08:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230238AbjCCIuq (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Mar 2023 03:50:46 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49846 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229694AbjCCIun (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Mar 2023 03:50:43 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A4CD4DBF3 for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 00:50:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id d30so7442982eda.4 for ; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 00:50:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1677833440; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dndwzDUiTBwin+4em8jIFfSJ0lqsymrrSYaNKkksNjM=; b=NdK7a6f1cOFR6TuQdQzPSyK1MHMHdKF7SGtqn69KjcdiaofuVfahqOM4p12CA9ftUf RwoSqd+1OOGGLPLxeIJp5bt8x10lQ9y6JTpePugwywM0/otiRIIrOnVKXJS3FpawAoQ7 c2tZAKP0xB3ZUrQrxaagTNA6uMY3LSTONdcj6hUQCL/eZohmN+w8BJN9Aie9DUr1Jwae 2SxJ+2U6XE4WQb/Of9OKx0ViudVJ0B6rVVkbhTK6YjwRcimsNmksk5uhThL/dNSE2xin Hod6U0Zc9rWrdYG1bDwoxI2JFIEdGdaq+tY3z9jdFbee61UcrET7HS2ON+ft+VhCkAgK 1leA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1677833440; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dndwzDUiTBwin+4em8jIFfSJ0lqsymrrSYaNKkksNjM=; b=BuhGw+OxuR5tQlMg1QlaFsSCZmIuP3ERkZ05UzA1FSud8d7qZfznSD6OYcEsp3jA8K 1IydqToKLbaxdVyj5aVe6Wh5sF3a2wOp5iT4IUkV0EuPDKgqoiWnIWeX8LUL+Zygd+Jg kG+V+5EVYJ5FJegIm76Xyk+kIcY52SoOkTM8zEpQ8OLA4GYB9UM/GSZCW+DuuRdqqu+T w/j3KM9BHXY79Nf4E+MZMYcwZQr0A19/HxvkRy3GicpJmVaUce0Ifo5tjTSkUJAG1cXH oCGbw2KtI8eZj6AoE4d/390Ek3QXum3PIM3Pj6ZfDjWaBu6akcpanqGdIBYxaUBgZDtn 5Fcw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWwyxULeMmjw6HrCexilAXGni1ggM7Pll6SO1BfEQb5jaAi+gsm Ls4/jvQfPRHfBTSS+F/ilNeqXA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+SR49rThj/UUh3GScIzZndNq5/VTAUgy96BLSGsSV7wpmsRQjjCGRZyfu2YPpxDcJqhRr2og== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d04e:0:b0:4ad:7c7c:a70d with SMTP id n14-20020aa7d04e000000b004ad7c7ca70dmr1240291edo.19.1677833440681; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 00:50:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.20] ([178.197.216.144]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h30-20020a50cdde000000b004c10b4f9ebesm886669edj.15.2023.03.03.00.50.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Mar 2023 00:50:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2023 09:50:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: aspeed: support for AST2600-i2cv2 Content-Language: en-US To: Ryan Chen , Wolfram Sang Cc: Joel Stanley , Brendan Higgins , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Andrew Jeffery , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Philipp Zabel , Rob Herring , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , "linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" References: <20230226031321.3126756-1-ryan_chen@aspeedtech.com> <20230226031321.3126756-2-ryan_chen@aspeedtech.com> <53090449-58c9-bc03-56df-aa8ae93c0c26@linaro.org> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/03/2023 09:28, Ryan Chen wrote: > Hello Krzysztof, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski >> Sent: Friday, March 3, 2023 4:20 PM >> To: Ryan Chen ; Wolfram Sang >> >> Cc: Joel Stanley ; Brendan Higgins >> ; Krzysztof Kozlowski >> ; Andrew Jeffery ; >> devicetree@vger.kernel.org; Philipp Zabel ; Rob >> Herring ; Benjamin Herrenschmidt >> ; linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org; >> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >> openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: aspeed: support for AST2600-i2cv2 >> >> On 01/03/2023 06:57, Ryan Chen wrote: >>> Hello Krzysztof, >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski >>>> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2023 4:25 PM >>>> To: Ryan Chen ; Andrew Jeffery >>>> ; Brendan Higgins ; >>>> Benjamin Herrenschmidt ; Joel Stanley >>>> ; Rob Herring ; Krzysztof >>>> Kozlowski ; Philipp Zabel >>>> ; linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org; >>>> openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; >>>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; >>>> linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: aspeed: support for >>>> AST2600-i2cv2 >>>> >>>> On 26/02/2023 04:13, Ryan Chen wrote: >>>>> Add ast2600-i2cv2 compatible and aspeed,global-regs, aspeed,timeout >>>>> aspeed,xfer-mode description for ast2600-i2cv2. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Chen >>>>> --- >>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/aspeed,i2c.yaml | 44 >> +++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/aspeed,i2c.yaml >>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/aspeed,i2c.yaml >>>>> index f597f73ccd87..75de3ce41cf5 100644 >>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/aspeed,i2c.yaml >>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/aspeed,i2c.yaml >>>>> @@ -49,6 +49,25 @@ properties: >>>>> description: >>>>> states that there is another master active on this bus >>>>> >>>>> + aspeed,timeout: >>>>> + type: boolean >>>>> + description: I2C bus timeout enable for master/slave mode >>>> >>>> Nothing improved here in regards to my last comment. >>> >>> Yes, as I know your require is about " DT binding to represent hardware >> setup" >>> So I add more description about aspeed,timeout as blow. >>> >>> ASPEED SOC chip is server product, i2c bus may have fingerprint connect to >> another board. And also support hotplug. >>> The following is board-specific design example. >>> Board A Board B >>> ------------------------- ------------------------ >>> |i2c bus#1(master/slave) <===fingerprint ===> i2c bus#x (master/slave)| >>> |i2c bus#2(master)-> tmp i2c device | | >> | >>> |i2c bus#3(master)-> adc i2c device | | >> | >>> ------------------------- ------------------------ >>> >>> aspeed,timout properites: >>> For example I2C controller as slave mode, and suddenly disconnected. >>> Slave state machine will keep waiting for master clock in for rx/tx transmit. >>> So it need timeout setting to enable timeout unlock controller state. >>> And in another side. In Master side also need avoid suddenly slave >> miss(un-plug), Master will timeout and release the SDA/SCL. >>> >>> Do you mean add those description into ore aspeed,timout properites >> description? >> >> You are describing here one particular feature you want to enable in the driver >> which looks non-scalable and more difficult to configure/use. >> What I was looking for is to describe the actual configuration you have (e.g. >> multi-master) which leads to enable or disable such feature in your hardware. >> Especially that bool value does not scale later to actual timeout values in time >> (ms)... >> >> I don't know I2C that much, but I wonder - why this should be specific to >> Aspeed I2C and no other I2C controllers implement it? IOW, this looks quite >> generic and every I2C controller should have it. Adding it specific to Aspeed >> suggests that either we miss a generic property or this should not be in DT at >> all (because no one else has it...). >> >> Also I wonder, why you wouldn't enable timeout always... >> >> +Cc Wolfram, >> Maybe you know whether bool "timeout" property for one controller makes >> sense? Why we do not have it for all controllers? >> > Because, i2c bus didn’t specific timeout. > But SMBus defines a clock low time-out, TIMEOUT of 35 ms. > > It have definition in SMBus specification. > http://smbus.org/specs/SMBus_3_1_20180319.pdf > You can check Page 18, Note3 that have timeout description. Then you have already property for this - "smbus"? Best regards, Krzysztof