Message-ID: <3116a08a-30a8-c9b9-f079-26739c9e6d49@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 3 Mar 2023 11:35:00 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.8.0
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] interconnect: qcom: icc-rpm: Don't call
 __qcom_icc_set twice on the same node
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org,
        agross@kernel.org
Cc:     marijn.suijten@somainline.org, Georgi Djakov <djakov@kernel.org>,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230303023500.2173137-1-konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
 <59b28fb4-1367-9872-ed63-90847e380bb6@linaro.org>
 <29513b9e-8561-7f7e-370e-7515116c7ee6@linaro.org>
From:   Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <29513b9e-8561-7f7e-370e-7515116c7ee6@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 03/03/2023 11:33, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3.03.2023 12:32, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 03/03/2023 02:35, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> Currently, when sync_state calls set(n, n) all the paths for setting
>>> parameters on an icc node are called twice. Avoid that.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 751f4d14cdb4 ("interconnect: icc-rpm: Set destination bandwidth as well as source bandwidth")
>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> RFC comes from the fact that I *believe* this should be correct, but I'm
>>> not entirely sure about it..
>>>
>>>
>>>    drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c | 2 +-
>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
>>> index a6e0de03f46b..d35db1af9b08 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
>>> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static int qcom_icc_set(struct icc_node *src, struct icc_node *dst)
>>>        ret = __qcom_icc_set(src, src_qn, sum_bw);
>>>        if (ret)
>>>            return ret;
>>> -    if (dst_qn) {
>>> +    if (dst_qn && src_qn != dst_qn) {
>>>            ret = __qcom_icc_set(dst, dst_qn, sum_bw);
>>>            if (ret)
>>>                return ret;
>>
>> Is it possible for src_qn == dst_qn ?
> As the commit message says, sync_state calls set(n, n) in
> drivers/interconnect/core.c : icc_sync_state(struct device *dev)

So you've _seen_ that happen ?