Date:   Fri, 3 Mar 2023 17:39:21 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, peterz@infradead.org,
        jstultz@google.com, edumazet@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] softirq: avoid spurious stalls due to
 need_resched()
Message-ID: <20230303173921.29d9faef@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230304012535.GF1301832@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
References: <20221222221244.1290833-1-kuba@kernel.org>
        <20221222221244.1290833-3-kuba@kernel.org>
        <87r0u6j721.ffs@tglx>
        <20230303133143.7b35433f@kernel.org>
        <20230303223739.GC1301832@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
        <20230303233627.GA2136520@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
        <20230303154413.1d846ac3@kernel.org>
        <20230304012535.GF1301832@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 17:25:35 -0800 Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Just to be sure - have you seen Peter's patches?
> > 
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git core/softirq
> > 
> > I think it feeds the time limit to the callback from softirq,
> > so the local 3ms is no more?  
> 
> I might or might not have back in September of 2020.  ;-)
> 
> But either way, the question remains:  Should RCU_SOFTIRQ do time checking
> in ksoftirqd context?  Seems like the answer should be "yes", independently
> of Peter's patches.

:-o  I didn't notice, I thought that's from Dec 22, LWN was writing
about Peter's rework at that point. I'm not sure what the story is :(
And when / if any of these changes are coming downstream.