Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched: pick_next_rt_entity(): check list_entry
References: <8f5c938f-5c31-655b-fd8d-415fa192d705@huawei.com>
 <d3af2533-2990-e884-eb9a-20cbbfedde23@huawei.com>
To:     <borrello@diag.uniroma1.it>
Reply-To: <20230128-list-entry-null-check-sched-v3-1-b1a71bd1ac6b@diag.uniroma1.it>
CC:     <bristot@redhat.com>, <c.giuffrida@vu.nl>,
        <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
        <h.j.bos@vu.nl>, <jkl820.git@gmail.com>, <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        <mgorman@suse.de>, <mingo@elte.hu>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
        <pauld@redhat.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, <vschneid@redhat.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
From:   "guanjing (D)" <guanjing6@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <f55d7d68-737b-48fb-1857-95e1504d9fe0@huawei.com>
Date:   Sat, 4 Mar 2023 18:18:17 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d3af2533-2990-e884-eb9a-20cbbfedde23@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi, borrello:

I wonder why you send this patch? Did you meet such a problem in a 
real-world scenario, or it is a static warning style?

Thanks,
Guanjin.