Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1FBC678D4 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 10:24:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230351AbjCFKYN (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2023 05:24:13 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55202 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229621AbjCFKYH (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2023 05:24:07 -0500 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.153.233]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FC3E11B; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 02:23:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1678098237; x=1709634237; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=fAROdIHL4rwOPVUkhhOPISkKYjWoQ2xKz6j6/njHS2w=; b=Ji5gBBQTQc3BBhnSQNfI0i1KZQHrHtKZejzQrSYtHjweZaVdREDhq/H0 Gxifq5xd/B3YADIgfRfjjJQgLVqvimnW4BZl+cU8JzuIL5EOcd37h7Gfw aJ6ut4EJhygDU63G+IjslG4zLSVovWQZ2kVp+cygaAReE0vFYG42xmxWX W3RVoozUTI6PBZcchxEDMVyHAAXGfdo4UK0Km4zwYLN4WwSrC8OS93fJE VpwMLpTARxVSnLDeqe8zqW61vHxVOPNYnc82XRwLOfqF1GRrXzDj3r2tU DR7BqBsW4Y28q+j4S6LTJaxzkWZXIrqq6tOwyYVvvozkq0AaRyWdZK5XN Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,236,1673938800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="203456799" Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa3.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 06 Mar 2023 03:23:41 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.16; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 03:23:41 -0700 Received: from wendy (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.16 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 03:23:38 -0700 Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 10:23:10 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Minda Chen CC: Emil Renner Berthing , Vinod Koul , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Pawel Laszczak , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Peter Chen , Roger Quadros , Aswath Govindraju , Philipp Zabel , Conor Dooley , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add JH7110 USB driver support Message-ID: References: <20230306095212.25840-1-minda.chen@starfivetech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zMsznMw5/Z/x33K0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230306095212.25840-1-minda.chen@starfivetech.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --zMsznMw5/Z/x33K0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey Minda! On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 05:52:12PM +0800, Minda Chen wrote: > This patchset adds USB driver for the StarFive JH7110 SoC. > USB work mode is peripheral and using USB 2.0 PHY in VisionFive 2 board. > The patch has been tested on the VisionFive 2 board. >=20 > This patchset should be applied after the patchset [1] and patch [2]: > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230221083323.302471-1-xingyu.wu@starfiv= etech.com/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230215113249.47727-4-william.qiu@starfi= vetech.com/ >=20 > patch 1 is usb phy dt-binding document. > patch 2 is the glue layer of Cadence USB3 and USB phy > setting. USB controller IP is Cadence USB3.=20 > patch 3 is USB device tree configuration. >=20 > Minda Chen (3): > dt-bindings: phy: Add StarFive JH7110 USB dt-binding > usb: cdns3: add StarFive JH7110 USB glue layer > dts: usb: add StarFive JH7110 USB dts configuration. Unfortunately, this patchset hasn't really landed correctly. Usually, in a series, patches are sent as replies to the cover letter. Git's send-email will do this for you if you pass it multiple patches and a cover letter (I do it by passing a directory, eg patches/foo/v1) It appears that you have sent each patch separately, and to different recipients, which makes this harder to review. Please re-submit this with proper threading (and as v2 ideally, so that Greg's bot doesn't complain). Thanks, Conor. --zMsznMw5/Z/x33K0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZAW/DgAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0n+0AQD+Y8MI2RJ1ehfJEWSWYTvb547GcgP/f/R0S9BcWwWn8wEAynmRcm59mWRh Rz7uCk7KLQh077VMvMhoUxx305X21gU= =u/Bd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zMsznMw5/Z/x33K0--