MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1677063656.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <CABymUCMhoKoFHy8K6-ohrcAbyTpDe0Hig3oUM_wH4Db0-9yx+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20230224021713.stpcykx2tjkjwyti@vireshk-i7> <Y/hyf+/EqEeTu436@niej-dt-7B47>
 <20230227042349.3p2ijo6s6yyqc267@vireshk-i7> <CABymUCNBkr_65JHNVfbUGjxs6rhnj=eUyZ+5j6VtiDwqzLYtcA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20230227092953.ekh72r5h6xcqgusn@vireshk-i7>
In-Reply-To: <20230227092953.ekh72r5h6xcqgusn@vireshk-i7>
From:   Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 6 Mar 2023 18:48:09 +0800
Message-ID: <CABymUCO4Gb-vALx=qa1q=QNfTJWoqNpT2r3J_xHxhGk7FZE0nQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OPP: Simplify set_required_opp handling
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc:     cw00.choi@samsung.com, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> =E4=BA=8E2023=E5=B9=B42=E6=9C=8827=
=E6=97=A5=E5=91=A8=E4=B8=80 17:29=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
>
> On 27-02-23, 17:21, Jun Nie wrote:
> > Sorry for not expressing it accurately. I should say devfreq devices
> > pointers, just
> > devfreq_virt_devs vs genpd_virt_devs. Then you know why I add devfreq-d=
evs
> > dts nodes below.
>
> Won't something like dev_pm_opp_set_clkname() would be enough here too ? =
We
> already do this kind of work for clks and regulators.

Thanks! It is a possible solution. I will try to spare time on this as
higher priority tasks
are on my list.

>
> Having power domain specific information within CPU nodes isn't a require=
ment of
> the OPP core, but the general requirement of genpd core instead.
>
> --
> viresh