Date:   Mon, 6 Mar 2023 18:38:10 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc:     Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
        Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
        Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, vmalloc: fix high order __GFP_NOFAIL allocations
Message-ID: <ZAYlAvZ/e52/XSLi@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <20230305053035.1911-1-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
 <ZAWbjIJCarmxGa8k@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <ZAXZMz0n+CpWPVqy@pc636>
 <ZAXynvdNqcI0f6Us@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <6452176f-4c17-8e09-8561-c659cbea4014@suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6452176f-4c17-8e09-8561-c659cbea4014@suse.cz>
Precedence: bulk

Thanks. Here is an incremental diff
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index bef6cf2b4d46..b01295672a31 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2938,7 +2938,7 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid,
 		/*
 		 * Higher order nofail allocations are really expensive and
 		 * potentially dangerous (pre-mature OOM, disruptive reclaim
-		 * and compaction etc.
+		 * and compaction etc).
 		 */
 		alloc_gfp &= ~__GFP_NOFAIL;
 		nofail = true;
@@ -2965,7 +2965,7 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid,
 
 		/*
 		 * Higher order allocations must be able to be treated as
-		 * indepdenent small pages by callers (as they can with
+		 * independent small pages by callers (as they can with
 		 * small-page vmallocs). Some drivers do their own refcounting
 		 * on vmalloc_to_page() pages, some use page->mapping,
 		 * page->lru, etc.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs