Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 16:30:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 16:30:29 -0500 Received: from samba.sourceforge.net ([198.186.203.85]:57871 "HELO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 16:30:11 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 08:28:02 +1100 From: Anton Blanchard To: Jens Axboe Cc: Paul Larson , lkml , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Scsi problems in 2.5.1-pre9 Message-ID: <20011211212802.GA30520@krispykreme> In-Reply-To: <1008065277.25964.5.camel@plars.austin.ibm.com> <20011211164744.GC13498@suse.de> <20011211165426.GD13498@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011211165426.GD13498@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jens, > > > Incorrect number of segments after building list > > > counted 11, received 7 > > > > Attached patch should fix it. I just booted 2.5.1-pre10 on ppc64 and still get the errors: Incorrect number of segments after building list counted 3, received 2 req nr_sec 24, cur_nr_sec 8 This seems to be happening because we now allow sg merging through the BIOVEC_MERGEABLE macro. On ppc64 (and sparc64) we can coalesce two sg entries if the first one ends on a page boundary and the next one starts on a page boundary because we have an IO MMU. (I know that you know this, Im just explaining it for those who dont :) Should we just remove the warning now? Anton - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/