MIME-Version: 1.0
Date:   Mon, 06 Mar 2023 14:54:10 +0100
From:   =?UTF-8?Q?Rafa=C5=82_Mi=C5=82ecki?= <rafal@milecki.pl>
To:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc:     Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
        Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr>,
        Luka Perkov <luka.perkov@sartura.hr>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] nvmem: Let layout drivers be modules
In-Reply-To: <20230301152239.531194-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
References: <20230301152239.531194-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.13
Message-ID: <88b8ed4babd8c2d00ff4a4d8876378ba@milecki.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 2023-03-01 16:22, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> The base series on which these changes apply is still contained in [1],
> I would prefer to keep it as it was and apply this series on top of it.
> 
> (...)
> 
> [1] https://github.com/miquelraynal/linux/tree/nvmem-next/layouts

My experience with kernel development over all subsystems I touched is
that patches should be improved until being clean & acceptable. I never
sent a series with more recent patches fixing issues in earlier patches
of the same seriee.

So my preference would be to get a new, clean & complete set of patches.