Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 908C4C64EC4 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 03:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229776AbjCGDbl (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2023 22:31:41 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53358 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229645AbjCGDbj (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2023 22:31:39 -0500 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.154.123]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9FE82DE43; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 19:31:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1678159896; x=1709695896; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YOD5nQRRW+7Jh57Qsig/N2Wmv9BwmnlOQex/intAGlw=; b=is8kX2mX1ziLnGAbPuFX6L+rmD8YjNxPG2mdtlYqZxO34k4E9lnjofWy 9f3Xxe4bp7dvwKOPAeZdahAUgpUtAiOuUyyIMpqHbVfA+Hq/OMY6Ira/f gFHFThZE3JUTELREYOdkwTEVm/tr9TajXdHkZaFvEsYHlcGFxpK76csCL uqG7xO/6thInOIY7TxxbNOtVWGBf5cBYP81cLGGBbw8HB/Nz+Qvo0+eQt G8z3yJNEFfi8XwMui6t5s5HGyr2/ZP6Fdj2BRFcqZCc8LenirwhcfTSbg DSkF8Xv2861dAcUcz65YUBTU+sPr/fM5HMPqoo/kxWW4w1vps/iPaD2NE A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,238,1673938800"; d="scan'208";a="200283118" Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa4.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 06 Mar 2023 20:31:35 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.16; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 20:31:28 -0700 Received: from [10.40.24.46] (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2507.16 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 20:31:25 -0700 Message-ID: <3b16b932-da02-30b4-2eae-29c26b3453a1@microchip.com> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 09:01:18 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: at91: Make the irqchip immutable Content-Language: en-US To: Linus Walleij , Mark Brown CC: Ludovic Desroches , Alexandre Belloni , Claudiu Beznea , , , References: <20230216-gpio-at91-immutable-v1-0-44f52f148ab9@kernel.org> <20230216-gpio-at91-immutable-v1-1-44f52f148ab9@kernel.org> From: Nicolas Ferre Organization: microchip In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/03/2023 at 18:50, Linus Walleij wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 4:49 PM Mark Brown wrote: > >> To help gpiolib not fiddle around with the internals of the irqchip >> flag the chip as immutable, adding the calls into the gpiolib core >> required to do so. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown > > 1) I'm impressed that you're using AT91 hardware I'm delighted that you're using AT91 hardware ;-) Thanks for your help Mark! Regards, Nicolas > 2) Can you respin this on top of my pinctrl devel branch: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/log/?h=devel > There are some Andy-cleanups already queued for AT91 so I am a bit > worried of collisions. (If you feel confident they are orthogonal just > use v6.3-rc1) > > Yours, > Linus Walleij -- Nicolas Ferre