Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762225AbXINBCV (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2007 21:02:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755668AbXINBCN (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2007 21:02:13 -0400 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:45990 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753045AbXINBCM (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2007 21:02:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:01:56 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Mel Gorman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/13] Reduce external fragmentation by grouping pages by mobility v30 Message-Id: <20070913180156.ee0cdec4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070910112011.3097.8438.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> References: <20070910112011.3097.8438.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 730 Lines: 16 On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:20:11 +0100 (IST) Mel Gorman wrote: > Here is a restacked version of the grouping pages by mobility patches > based on the patches currently in your tree. It should be a drop-in > replacement for what is in 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 and is what I propose for merging > to mainline. It really gives me the creeps to throw away a large set of large patches and to then introduce a new set. What would go wrong if we just merged the patches I already have? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/