Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763062AbXINFPg (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Sep 2007 01:15:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753160AbXINFP1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Sep 2007 01:15:27 -0400 Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.37]:60202 "EHLO fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752319AbXINFP0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Sep 2007 01:15:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:14:47 +0900 From: Yasunori Goto To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] mm: Fix memory hotplug + sparsemem build. Cc: Andy Whitcroft , Paul Mundt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org In-Reply-To: <20070913194130.1611fd78.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20070914105420.F2E9.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20070913194130.1611fd78.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer-Plugin: BkASPil for Becky!2 Ver.2.068 Message-Id: <20070914115045.F2EB.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.27 [ja] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2470 Lines: 72 > On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:02:43 +0900 Yasunori Goto wrote: > > > > > /* call arch's memory hotadd */ > > > > > > > > > > OK, we're getting into a mess here. This patch fixes > > > update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch, but which patch > > > does update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch fix? > > > > > > At present I just whacked > > > update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch at the end of > > > everything, but that was lazy of me and it ends up making a mess. > > > > It is enough. No more patch is necessary for these issues. > > I already fixed about Andy-san's comment. :-) > > Now I'm more confused. I have two separeate questions: > > a) Is the justr-added update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd-fix.patch > still needed? I'm not sure exact meaning of "just-added". But, update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd-fix.patch is necessary for 2.6.23-rc4-mm1. > b) Which patch in 2.6.22-rc4-mm1 does 2.6.23-rc4-mm1? > update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch fix? In other > words, into which patch should I fold > update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch prior to sending > to Linus? In my understanding, update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch should be folded with all of memoryless-nodes-xxxxxxxxxxxx.patch. It sets N_HIGH_MEMORY for a new node-with-memory. But if you need specifing of more detail patch, becase N_HIGH_MEMORY is set in memoryless-nodes-introduce-ask-of-nodes-with-memory.patch, I suppose update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch should be fold with it. update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd-fix.patch ^^^ is fixes of update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch and memoryless-nodes-no-need-for-kswapd.patch Is it enough for your question? Or more confuse? > (I (usually) get to work this out for myself. Sometimes it is painful). > > Generally, if people tell me which patch-in-mm their patch is fixing, > it really helps. Adrian does this all the time. Sorry for your confusing... -- Yasunori Goto - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/