Date:   Wed, 8 Mar 2023 07:06:19 -0500
From:   Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc:     andersson@kernel.org, quic_shazhuss@quicinc.com, agross@kernel.org,
        konrad.dybcio@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8540p-ride: correct name of
 remoteproc_nsp0 firmware
Message-ID: <ZAh6O9TbX/pnOnxp@x1>
References: <20230307232340.2370476-1-bmasney@redhat.com>
 <1a915c33-ef32-852c-a856-10c8d35be151@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1a915c33-ef32-852c-a856-10c8d35be151@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.7 (2022-08-07)
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 12:02:04PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 08/03/2023 00:23, Brian Masney wrote:
> > The cdsp.mbn firmware that's referenced in sa8540p-ride.dts is actually
> > named cdsp0.mbn in the deliverables from Qualcomm. Let's go ahead and
> > correct the name to match what's in Qualcomm's deliverable.
> 
> I don't think vendor deliverables matter. linux-firmware is here more
> important. The file will be cdsp.mbn in the firmware, won't it?

cdsp0.mbn and cdsp1.mbn for the sa8540p are not in linux-firmware and I
far as I know there's no plan for someone to submit those since QC would
need to approve that. I can ask though since the DTS for these two bits
has been submitted upstream.

Brian