Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933037AbXINPnq (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:43:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752859AbXINPnh (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:43:37 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-4-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:58615 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751208AbXINPng (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:43:36 -0400 Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 01:43:45 +1000 From: Greg Banks To: Jeff Layton Cc: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ecryptfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, unionfs@filesystems.org, linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [NFS] [PATCH 2/7] NFS: if ATTR_KILL_S*ID bits are set, then skip mode change Message-ID: <20070914154345.GE25610@sgi.com> References: <200709041437.l84Eb4lw010007@dantu.rdu.redhat.com> <20070914102545.GF21965@sgi.com> <20070914070258.8fccb40e.jlayton@redhat.com> <20070914130924.GG21965@sgi.com> <20070914093846.7cdd89da.jlayton@redhat.com> <20070914144033.GD25610@sgi.com> <20070914105838.efbfc45e.jlayton@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070914105838.efbfc45e.jlayton@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1225 Lines: 34 On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 10:58:38AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 00:40:33 +1000 > Greg Banks wrote: > > > > Ok, you convinced me. > > Right. When I was first looking at this, I considered some similar > approaches, but hit roadblocks with all of them. The only real option > seems to be to leave this to the server, but that does assume that the > server handles this properly. > > Servers that don't are broken, IMO. According to what spec? A quick trip around the machine room shows that neither Solaris 10 nor Darwin 7.9.0 clobber setuid on write either. > If Irix isn't clearing these bits > on a write then it might be good to see if they can fix that... I think first you'd have to mount a serious argument that it's broken, more serious than "it works differently from Linux". Greg. -- Greg Banks, R&D Software Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group. Apparently, I'm Bedevere. Which MPHG character are you? I don't speak for SGI. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/