Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2666AC6FD1F for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 08:45:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230319AbjCIIot (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2023 03:44:49 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41102 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230123AbjCIIoc (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2023 03:44:32 -0500 Received: from fd01.gateway.ufhost.com (fd01.gateway.ufhost.com [61.152.239.71]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32A0225B86; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 00:44:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from EXMBX165.cuchost.com (unknown [175.102.18.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "EXMBX165", Issuer "EXMBX165" (not verified)) by fd01.gateway.ufhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5CB24E2D9; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 16:44:23 +0800 (CST) Received: from EXMBX061.cuchost.com (172.16.6.61) by EXMBX165.cuchost.com (172.16.6.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.42; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 16:44:23 +0800 Received: from [192.168.125.128] (183.27.96.115) by EXMBX061.cuchost.com (172.16.6.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.42; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 16:44:22 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 16:44:25 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: watchdog: Add watchdog for StarFive JH7100 and JH7110 Content-Language: en-US To: Krzysztof Kozlowski CC: , , , Wim Van Sebroeck , Rob Herring , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Philipp Zabel , Samin Guo , , Guenter Roeck , Emil Renner Berthing , Conor Dooley References: <20230308034036.99213-1-xingyu.wu@starfivetech.com> <20230308034036.99213-2-xingyu.wu@starfivetech.com> <94ba1427-21ea-86ee-d60d-7817f8e673fa@linaro.org> <783fe50c-1649-b1c4-06cd-ac81bcad5117@starfivetech.com> <812bbccf-010f-1138-f104-7db7d47ebc9a@linaro.org> From: Xingyu Wu In-Reply-To: <812bbccf-010f-1138-f104-7db7d47ebc9a@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [183.27.96.115] X-ClientProxiedBy: EXCAS066.cuchost.com (172.16.6.26) To EXMBX061.cuchost.com (172.16.6.61) X-YovoleRuleAgent: yovoleflag Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2023/3/9 16:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 09/03/2023 09:13, Xingyu Wu wrote: >> On 2023/3/9 15:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 08/03/2023 04:40, Xingyu Wu wrote: >>>> Add bindings to describe the watchdog for the StarFive JH7100/JH7110 SoC. >>>> And Use JH7100 as first StarFive SoC with watchdog. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Xingyu Wu >>>> --- >>> >>> What happened here? You wrote in changelog "Modified" but what exactly? >>> How am I supposed to find it? >>> >>> Provide detailed description, since you decided to remove my tag. >>> Otherwise, standard response: >>> >>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process. >>> >>> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it. >>> >>> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: >>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new >>> versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the >>> tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the >>> version they apply. >>> >>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L540 >>> >>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. >>> >> >> I am sorry I did not elaborate it. The dt-bindings was only supported JH7110 watchdog in v3 patchset >> and you had sent Reviewed-by tags. But at the same time tried to add JH7100 watchdog after discussion >> and used JH7100 as the dt-binding's name because JH7100 is the first StarFive SoCs about watchdog. >> The compatible also add 'starfive,jh7100-wdt' in the dt-binding. It is different from the v3 patch and >> I did not add the Reviewed-by tag. > > So what is the difference? Filename and new compatible? > Yes. So are these acceptable and can still add the tag? Best regards, Xingyu Wu