Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7E1C74A44 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 17:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230493AbjCIRur (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2023 12:50:47 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58024 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230093AbjCIRuh (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2023 12:50:37 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4537F6B43; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 09:50:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1678384235; x=1709920235; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ogVypCdkPt8E5X9bDUGx7JSe5g2+nmoHHjkYAcaFWFg=; b=nUHKITiAJVDNLlPabHZzAzGakVZaLNBYVATMvCMy/VQYQ5c556EjDgk5 kThnEpGQhS0KjVDgeMwN0Lp2UEvJelKHVcMA61FTMldUTcxYGt8M4vd2S Osd0iTjrnJjTvCiy9iFzVZBxCtv0Kc6vNAk/+Hu2MVWr2Ie0qx4/d2dKe hZA1/ck+HBlPt3DZOyJG1i0JtwFrrPkMGDTB76FZ91uVvoX6C70hYfz0z cbgVhsIYumm2pMGQCl+t1FUETTcGW0NCCN9aJDSDdYjc6iWy3PV/zZ28z r2n5HQusIrnh920a0s3Fcjrtqn343eoRxlOQMudp9GKDY/sn3kHc2qSaq Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10644"; a="324855414" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,247,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="324855414" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Mar 2023 09:50:35 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10644"; a="677462919" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,247,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="677462919" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2023 09:50:32 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1paKPO-000Sb6-0d; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 19:50:30 +0200 Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 19:50:29 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Linux-Next Mailing List , open list , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , linux-mm , Arnd Bergmann , Anders Roxell , Shuah Khan , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski Subject: Re: selftests: gpio: crash on arm64 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 09:33:29PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > Following kernel warnings and crash notices on arm64 Rpi4 device while > running selftests: gpio on Linux mainline 6.3.0-rc1 kernel and Linux next. > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing ... > [ 61.177432] *** DEADLOCK *** > [ 61.177432] > [ 61.177434] 3 locks held by modprobe/510: > [ 61.177436] #0: ffff000040000698 (&n->list_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: > get_partial_node.part.0 (mm/slub.c:2271) > [ 61.177448] #1: ffff80000b227f18 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: > vprintk_emit (kernel/printk/printk.c:1936 kernel/printk/printk.c:2315) > [ 61.177460] #2: ffff80000b228388 (console_srcu){....}-{0:0}, at: > console_flush_all (include/linux/srcu.h:200 kernel/printk/printk.c:290 > kernel/printk/printk.c:2934) How is it related to the GPIO? Can you bisect if it's a regression somewhere? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko