Message-ID: <15b9df26-bdc1-e139-8df7-62f966c719ed@sberdevices.ru>
Date:   Fri, 10 Mar 2023 12:42:13 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.7.1
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/4] several updates to virtio/vsock
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
        Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>
CC:     Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
        <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <kernel@sberdevices.ru>, <oxffffaa@gmail.com>
References: <1804d100-1652-d463-8627-da93cb61144e@sberdevices.ru>
 <20230310090937.s55af2fx56zn4ewu@sgarzare-redhat>
From:   Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20230310090937.s55af2fx56zn4ewu@sgarzare-redhat>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk


On 10.03.2023 12:09, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> Hi Arseniy,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 11:24:42PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> this patchset evolved from previous v2 version (see link below). It does
>> several updates to virtio/vsock:
>> 1) Changes 'virtio_transport_inc/dec_rx_pkt()' interface. Now instead of
>>   using skbuff state ('head' and 'data' pointers) to update 'fwd_cnt'
>>   and 'rx_bytes', integer value is passed as an input argument. This
>>   makes code more simple, because in this case we don't need to update
>>   skbuff state before calling 'virtio_transport_inc/dec_rx_pkt()'. In
>>   more common words - we don't need to change skbuff state to update
>>   'rx_bytes' and 'fwd_cnt' correctly.
>> 2) For SOCK_STREAM, when copying data to user fails, current skbuff is
>>   not dropped. Next read attempt will use same skbuff and last offset.
>>   Instead of 'skb_dequeue()', 'skb_peek()' + '__skb_unlink()' are used.
>>   This behaviour was implemented before skbuff support.
>> 3) For SOCK_SEQPACKET it removes unneeded 'skb_pull()' call, because for
>>   this type of socket each skbuff is used only once: after removing it
>>   from socket's queue, it will be freed anyway.
> 
> thanks for the fixes, I would wait a few days to see if there are any
> comments and then I think you can send it on net without RFC.
> 
> @Bobby if you can take a look, your ack would be appreciated :-)
Ok, thanks for review. I'll wait for several days and also wait until
net-next will be opened. Then i'll resend this patchset with net-next

Thanks, Arseniy
> 
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>