Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39308C6FA99 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 16:29:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230273AbjCJQ3r (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2023 11:29:47 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48022 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229754AbjCJQ3U (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2023 11:29:20 -0500 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com (fllv0015.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.141]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42F0011CD58; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:25:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 32AGPoYe056068; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 10:25:50 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1678465550; bh=fF6Rw0pOCngbb8SjQpdrdE3KGPTtPzwJwSW3GuI0RQU=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=b6gIUtMHE2OeytgaRMp8w/8WeFKJPWp5G1el0t8+psg2fpDRMpqstihAzr3IcxbYp QjDu1u/8PwSWrmduKJwaaD2Yr5EPpt/Dic6tkUiP58oW3GC/nbqVXPqC+mMsqWrZVq tc/5tAJN8amTq3IQBzKiUbeO3frSvQJ34H851EBw= Received: from DLEE113.ent.ti.com (dlee113.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.24]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 32AGPoEd127855 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 10 Mar 2023 10:25:50 -0600 Received: from DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) by DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.16; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 10:25:50 -0600 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.16 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 10:25:49 -0600 Received: from localhost (ileaxei01-snat.itg.ti.com [10.180.69.5]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 32AGPnY0011606; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 10:25:49 -0600 From: Devarsh Thakkar To: , , , , , , , , CC: , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v7 3/3] remoteproc: k3-r5: Use separate compatible string for TI AM62x SoC family Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 21:55:44 +0530 Message-ID: <20230310162544.3468365-4-devarsht@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20230310162544.3468365-1-devarsht@ti.com> References: <20230310162544.3468365-1-devarsht@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org AM62 and AM62A SoCs use single core R5F which is a new scenario different than the one being used with CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU which is for utilizing a single core from a set of cores available in R5F cluster present in the SoC. To support this single core scenario map it with newly defined CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE and use it when compatible is set to ti,am62-r5fss. Also set PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_SINGLE_CORE config for CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE too as it is required by R5 core when it is being as general purpose core instead of device manager. Signed-off-by: Devarsh Thakkar --- V2: - Fix indentation and ordering issues as per review comments V3: - Change CLUSTER_MODE_NONE value to -1 V4: - No change V5: - No change (fixing typo in email address) V6: - Use CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE for AM62x - Set PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_SINGLE_CORE for single core. V7: - Simplify and rebase on top of base commit "[PATCH v7] remoteproc: k3-r5: Simplify cluster mode setting" --- drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c index c2ec0f432921..df32f6bc4325 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c @@ -71,14 +71,16 @@ struct k3_r5_mem { /* * All cluster mode values are not applicable on all SoCs. The following * are the modes supported on various SoCs: - * Split mode : AM65x, J721E, J7200 and AM64x SoCs - * LockStep mode : AM65x, J721E and J7200 SoCs - * Single-CPU mode : AM64x SoCs only + * Split mode : AM65x, J721E, J7200 and AM64x SoCs + * LockStep mode : AM65x, J721E and J7200 SoCs + * Single-CPU mode : AM64x SoCs only + * Single-Core mode : AM62x, AM62A SoCs */ enum cluster_mode { CLUSTER_MODE_SPLIT = 0, CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP, CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU, + CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE }; /** @@ -86,11 +88,13 @@ enum cluster_mode { * @tcm_is_double: flag to denote the larger unified TCMs in certain modes * @tcm_ecc_autoinit: flag to denote the auto-initialization of TCMs for ECC * @single_cpu_mode: flag to denote if SoC/IP supports Single-CPU mode + * @is_single_core: flag to denote if SoC/IP has only single core R5 */ struct k3_r5_soc_data { bool tcm_is_double; bool tcm_ecc_autoinit; bool single_cpu_mode; + bool is_single_core; }; /** @@ -838,7 +842,8 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) core0 = list_first_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem); if (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP || - cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU) { + cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU || + cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE) { core = core0; } else { core = kproc->core; @@ -877,7 +882,8 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) * with the bit configured, so program it only on * permitted cores */ - if (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU) { + if (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU || + cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE) { set_cfg = PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_SINGLE_CORE; } else { /* @@ -1069,6 +1075,7 @@ static void k3_r5_adjust_tcm_sizes(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) if (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP || cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU || + cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE || !cluster->soc_data->tcm_is_double) return; @@ -1145,6 +1152,8 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) if (cluster->soc_data->single_cpu_mode) { mode = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_SINGLE_CORE ? CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU : CLUSTER_MODE_SPLIT; + } else if (cluster->soc_data->is_single_core) { + mode = CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE; } else { mode = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_LOCKSTEP ? CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP : CLUSTER_MODE_SPLIT; @@ -1264,9 +1273,12 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev) goto err_add; } - /* create only one rproc in lockstep mode or single-cpu mode */ + /* create only one rproc in lockstep, single-cpu or + * single core mode + */ if (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP || - cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU) + cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU || + cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE) break; } @@ -1709,19 +1721,33 @@ static int k3_r5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) /* * default to most common efuse configurations - Split-mode on AM64x * and LockStep-mode on all others + * default to most common efuse configurations - + * Split-mode on AM64x + * Single core on AM62x + * LockStep-mode on all others */ - cluster->mode = data->single_cpu_mode ? + if (!data->is_single_core) + cluster->mode = data->single_cpu_mode ? CLUSTER_MODE_SPLIT : CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP; + else + cluster->mode = CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE; } - if (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU && !data->single_cpu_mode) { + if ((cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU && !data->single_cpu_mode) || + (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE && !data->is_single_core)) { dev_err(dev, "Cluster mode = %d is not supported on this SoC\n", cluster->mode); return -EINVAL; } num_cores = of_get_available_child_count(np); - if (num_cores != 2) { - dev_err(dev, "MCU cluster requires both R5F cores to be enabled, num_cores = %d\n", + if (num_cores != 2 && !data->is_single_core) { + dev_err(dev, "MCU cluster requires both R5F cores to be enabled but num_cores is set to = %d\n", + num_cores); + return -ENODEV; + } + + if (num_cores != 1 && data->is_single_core) { + dev_err(dev, "SoC supports only single core R5 but num_cores is set to %d\n", num_cores); return -ENODEV; } @@ -1763,18 +1789,28 @@ static const struct k3_r5_soc_data am65_j721e_soc_data = { .tcm_is_double = false, .tcm_ecc_autoinit = false, .single_cpu_mode = false, + .is_single_core = false, }; static const struct k3_r5_soc_data j7200_j721s2_soc_data = { .tcm_is_double = true, .tcm_ecc_autoinit = true, .single_cpu_mode = false, + .is_single_core = false, }; static const struct k3_r5_soc_data am64_soc_data = { .tcm_is_double = true, .tcm_ecc_autoinit = true, .single_cpu_mode = true, + .is_single_core = false, +}; + +static const struct k3_r5_soc_data am62_soc_data = { + .tcm_is_double = false, + .tcm_ecc_autoinit = true, + .single_cpu_mode = false, + .is_single_core = true, }; static const struct of_device_id k3_r5_of_match[] = { @@ -1782,6 +1818,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id k3_r5_of_match[] = { { .compatible = "ti,j721e-r5fss", .data = &am65_j721e_soc_data, }, { .compatible = "ti,j7200-r5fss", .data = &j7200_j721s2_soc_data, }, { .compatible = "ti,am64-r5fss", .data = &am64_soc_data, }, + { .compatible = "ti,am62-r5fss", .data = &am62_soc_data, }, { .compatible = "ti,j721s2-r5fss", .data = &j7200_j721s2_soc_data, }, { /* sentinel */ }, }; -- 2.34.1