Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755604AbXIORMS (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Sep 2007 13:12:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752403AbXIORMJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Sep 2007 13:12:09 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:59681 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752293AbXIORMI (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Sep 2007 13:12:08 -0400 Message-ID: <46EC1244.7090803@cv-sv.de> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 19:11:32 +0200 From: Christian Volkmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-AT; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070803 SUSE/1.1.4-3.1 SeaMonkey/1.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: Pete Zaitcev , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Michal Piotrowski Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc6: usb 1-1: device not accepting address 2, error -62 References: <46EAFCF7.1030907@cv-sv.de> <20070915034819.3e695370.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070915095628.491c8a86.zaitcev@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20070915095628.491c8a86.zaitcev@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+Z4liR3C0VJepPWAD1IvSxZ/+HR5x/+i0RctE 19terj6CNOrNWrzqjYfwDG/w0PLptXzVZIxCOx5BwoMJ0wpHiF blZ4iqtK+7EXqR0QhbRUw== To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1880 Lines: 58 Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 03:48:19 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > >>> I have an error message with 2.6.23-rc6. >>> This did not happen with 2.6.22. >> Another one for Michal's dirt file. > > No, I think it's the module ordering again. > >>> 2.6.23-rc6 boot.msg extract ( hub/usb ) > > I wish users stopped this filtering, it's a very bad idea. > Sorry about this. I want to keep the postings shorter. Please see my earlier reply for the complete messages made with CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME and CONFIG_USB_DEBUG > As it is, there's no message showing when ehci_hcd was loaded. > We can try piece together the picture: > >>> <6>usb usb1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice >>> <6>hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found >>> <6>hub 1-0:1.0: 2 ports detected >>> <6>usb usb2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice >>> <6>hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found >>> <6>hub 2-0:1.0: 2 ports detected >>> <6>usb 1-1: new low speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 2 > > ok this was ohci_hcd > >>> <3>usb 1-1: device not accepting address 2, error -62 >>> <6>usb 5-2: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2 > > was ehci here? We don't know but I bet it was, because: > >>> <6>usb 6-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 2 > >>> 2.6.22 boot.msg extract ( hub/usb ) > > This one seems far shorter. The EHCI comes online late here as well, > but not as late as in the "regression" case. I am wondering if we > have some kind of "parallel PCI probing" option in action here. I can send my .config on request. The system itself is a regular suse 10.2. > > -- Pete > Christian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/