MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230215-immutable-chips-v3-0-972542092a77@linaro.org> <CAMRc=MdyjQDEMNxGYOKwWHry7MnEFMHYZSg=-FPohNwn6dxjaQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=MdyjQDEMNxGYOKwWHry7MnEFMHYZSg=-FPohNwn6dxjaQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 10 Mar 2023 23:44:40 +0100
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYZvvPRgdctcFo+o24+PEWaz-dpPd0ntFg7qWQDYNPKsA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/17] Mass convert GPIO IRQ chips to be immutable
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc:     Mun Yew Tham <mun.yew.tham@intel.com>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
        Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>, Alban Bedel <albeu@free.fr>,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>,
        Jay Fang <f.fangjian@huawei.com>,
        Daniel Palmer <daniel@thingy.jp>,
        Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
        William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@linaro.org>,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
        Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 4:25=E2=80=AFPM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>=
 wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 8:45=E2=80=AFAM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linar=
o.org> wrote:
> >
> > We are getting tired of these irq_chips not getting converted
> > to be immutable, so I just take out the big hammer and fix
> > some that I deem not too complex as best I can.
> >
> > I stopped after doing some, I will take another sweep at some
> > point I guess.

> Normally these irq_chip conversions would go upstream as fixes but
> this time there are too many at once. I applied them to my
> gpio/for-next branch. Let's give them some time in next and later we
> can backport them if necessary.

That's fine since the maintainers didn't get around to fixing it themselves
yet anyway it can't be that important to them.

I will try to take a second sweep and see what is left on the floor, and
then I guess a sweep over the gpio_chips in pinctrl as well.

Yours,
Linus Walleij