Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755005AbXIOTaS (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Sep 2007 15:30:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752200AbXIOTaF (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Sep 2007 15:30:05 -0400 Received: from ox.emgs.com ([194.248.190.99]:35394 "EHLO ox.emgs.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751874AbXIOTaE (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Sep 2007 15:30:04 -0400 Message-ID: <46EC32B7.7010404@pvv.org> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:29:59 +0200 From: Jon Ivar Rykkelid User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: John Stoffel , Prakash Punnoor , Robert Hancock , Tejun Heo , Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller References: <46E8EABF.3060409@pvv.org> <46EA97F0.9000300@pvv.org> <46EAF099.9070805@pvv.org> <200709150912.28358.prakash@punnoor.de> <46EBB08A.5050709@pvv.org> <18155.61586.118828.112512@stoffel.org> In-Reply-To: <18155.61586.118828.112512@stoffel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2020 Lines: 41 John Stoffel wrote: > What happens when you just have ONE disk connected to the motherboard > controller, and the rest connected to PCI controllers? Does it crap > out then? You've just such a nice repeatable problem across > motherboards that it's a shame to waste this debugging time. > Sorry, I gave in. I have now abandoned my nvidia trials (both motherboards have been returned, and I'm now running with Intel chipset) - My current motherboard is less ideal (in terms of PCI-slots etc.), but on the other hand it works... > I'm wondering if it's a PCI bus issue somehow, and that the load on > the motherboard controller isn't supportable when you have a bunch of > disks on PCI controllers as well. Shot in the dark... > That was actually not such a bad idea... Unfortunately it's too late now (If not I should have tested for sure). I was/am after all running an 8-disk SATA array (plus a normal IDE disk - not in the raid). I had 4 disks running through two PCI-cards and 4 disks used the motherboard's controller. - When all 8 disks were connected to the two PCI-cards the speed dropped compared to when the motherboard's controller took some load.. (So it could maybe be an issue with bandwidth / load ? - I don't know.) > Thanks for all your hard work on this, I know how frustrating it is to > not have a stable system! > Sorry for giving in, but I felt I was banging my head against the wall (and with too few sensible solutions being suggested). Now I guess I'm semi-happy that all seems to work OK with the Intel chipset.. Frustrating that the sata_nv-driver / nvidia HW didn't work with my configuration, though... Thank you all for your effort as well - hope someone figures this out sometime in the future. All the best Jon Ivar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/