Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE37C6FD19 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 02:14:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229874AbjCKCOX (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2023 21:14:23 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35490 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229473AbjCKCOV (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2023 21:14:21 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1033.google.com (mail-pj1-x1033.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1033]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B318812B03A; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 18:14:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1033.google.com with SMTP id 6-20020a17090a190600b00237c5b6ecd7so11692726pjg.4; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 18:14:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1678500859; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Th+pbPHwUfIznt5t3aYufVmsSA6jXeeaBN7D/5f6K1k=; b=URVrSNrTk7lDWS57IoA6Fabw22VHJ0/qAwQLyM5yn+Fpjiq0Ib5rqOIvveeMWmFQKY CyYelRlNJUxNvTHXB5lqn6KdZgIn8Q36QGjr8vOzmVv1TAxtOQE/c1dqLFwZ0Xuz7sMp HI7gzXMOTf06X/C6NltU/ONsJV+acrlB8TsvFOoQDFQP2lyVkDT0TMMOlbrpwgeK1jdo YAjxjegMDbFC0LFnoR4ji9LZmCUzs6l67h6afrEAFeIA6tbBQuLaPlJ6mA9oJ6HE16D8 LK5Y301gpZtdp6PbP3OU7FQW07dlmH1lrTNQgyy8wny0QxL8cqFoie0vdzX/XEmhg5dz aTVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678500859; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Th+pbPHwUfIznt5t3aYufVmsSA6jXeeaBN7D/5f6K1k=; b=r8VHEkt0WiHqguOs6q0sh1yI8NzOdQ2eMODyCUeRFKGDUNueXrjk4cH3fX8ibFTQT9 mqycRtc8GEDnxYK5W36q9eLjoMqNN+89WOEUZQ8/r90bl6Vcf44/+TKgjnXLBqBViFAU dexgyTnOKXP6eBRuzsk23QbSgi/PYa4j2cw2nRrZuWmAmB9GLn4Jbq5zen09kStsQaz2 Vjs3j/FgJFA4lAHIz3O8Fa/WWEUqYLrDJ7iaz5sZMEXIPLJG5F9WQ3VJUoM5mIEDtotD KOkz96te4PDUtjXpB47ySaqcChus7dyx3qhpVmPnYzR8hfPLg/8fSdAHJqJbQOaMnHR/ oXDg== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWE+kSRKWWNm0QqdoRI14udfKGbvzbiOP7PJ3kWa6OJEu36fjt/ +ntqUbKvXKcupFxLHnHkx8o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+m2LCt6qX8jXKfsp0o8SUC4txHmHMqI1q7pruEdftPUf58X6vd9VnTgp511/2BMXL4fDbyUg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:3cab:b0:cd:3bca:cfa2 with SMTP id b43-20020a056a203cab00b000cd3bcacfa2mr29722214pzj.23.1678500859071; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 18:14:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian.me (subs02-180-214-232-1.three.co.id. [180.214.232.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d5-20020aa78e45000000b00593e4e6516csm417945pfr.124.2023.03.10.18.14.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 10 Mar 2023 18:14:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by debian.me (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3965E1065AA; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 09:14:10 +0700 (WIB) Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 09:14:10 +0700 From: Bagas Sanjaya To: Sreevani Sreejith Cc: void@manifault.com, psreep@gmail.com, Linux BPF , Linux Kernel Mailing List , andrii@kernel.org, mykola@meta.com, Linux Documentation Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 bpf-next] BPF, docs: libbpf Overview Document Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mOE/t2XkG9SdZEvj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --mOE/t2XkG9SdZEvj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 04:11:38PM +0000, Sreevani Sreejith wrote: > Thanks, Sanjaya, for taking the time to review. I will submit a patch wit= h all the changes you suggested. I left the emphasis on the code line as is= =2E If you have a strong suggestion to remove it, let me know. >=20 > Also, this is the first time I am sending a reply to a patch. So please l= et me know if I have to adjust the reply format. >=20 Hi, It seems like you reply with HTML format, which makes plain-text formatting looks messy. See Documentation/process/email-clients.rst for how to configure your email client to send plain-text emails. Also, please reply inline with appropriate context while keeping list of recipients in To: and Cc: intact (via "Reply all" button in your client). I have to add original recipients back since these are omitted =66rom your reply. Thanks! --=20 An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara --mOE/t2XkG9SdZEvj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQSSYQ6Cy7oyFNCHrUH2uYlJVVFOowUCZAvj6QAKCRD2uYlJVVFO o9ViAP9MnGibNFkFvnc4fwSPcgj7P86cNwAXoe7to9S12qpljwEArSiIuPpRET+f lufOY2W/XIXAc4PTUuyF7GHqWpbXggM= =mPH8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mOE/t2XkG9SdZEvj--