Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B14C61DA4 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 12:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230217AbjCKM1f (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Mar 2023 07:27:35 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55810 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230201AbjCKM12 (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Mar 2023 07:27:28 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 960C212BAE6; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 04:27:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id v16so7456583wrn.0; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 04:27:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1678537646; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uCcG9r8zvzVa32ACP9pjDJ0u/GOLkhnUW6bBmHPkFUA=; b=BOGEDY//pxaL4SCTRH2vyx67C4dYcNczt8afRE0cKxI6FdPArV/rXR6+bJhPgRZQiw vTO0rO5KG3YXJbe8rZdnEPuXzP1auxt2qvnkH9FvfBLgPk/em1BPa90EJhzDTLvr1moc zXmAwua8R7s5upW7dDpUchKRs1ent4I9a4F90aU4+jUXcQbs2BV6WHfrXL4WKNX4zCXG ycn7EzNqAF5FkRnRpO+qPhl0dt28JEKdiBAzTdsijvD6eVScRbjL+wWJn19ncTQ286NJ ygTz1V910/Nncr+QGtLs79GUsxRhdjEB1IY0czqd7BDgW/EOYRmV/X5g3tI2n1MnaXvG HVpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678537646; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=uCcG9r8zvzVa32ACP9pjDJ0u/GOLkhnUW6bBmHPkFUA=; b=I73IgZwOxuLlC84M6rxNHG8XbWnDjrYJvsdSpj+QAZ9rhsb0p3N/tGm3SYM5WItqqy rlsC4UzgrDpK3aGThOJ9xV/1/r53sdMFX5qQsdyzXQ+F13w5/5JD/AomRKCRtZtnDijW lawdCWQtJ3vw+Cu/Q9fUn6mHsTxxZgX37gP/hXKeaxbNmitwn4UtueiKksP+Za3227Zw wKCMJRBfWcUeSaFKx9Kj0nVfd6tdhzGXHYVhWAED2Veqerw7Z6P7G6RhaV9eF5JOW2ZN jJ1UQTnOD9gXV7uYiZdQ3oxYciqlBErWIzbcee2IMknotZMguTHeL+MRYK5YgvH1e/cw TOIw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVtUcVVO9q+Ld+BPBLwYhYtAxL/E8xPs3ig7joW1s11hebBDP15 SuK0diIR8GAsoavv3IPh+nQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9YQlBu0WUqDjanj5JJDkG3xTc2kmCFY8j138j5Ef7mpCwU5fRxBfA5EEIVlb91ZHDVEBW9Hw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ce90:0:b0:2c5:4c9f:cf3b with SMTP id r16-20020adfce90000000b002c54c9fcf3bmr3854705wrn.7.1678537646073; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 04:27:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian ([63.135.72.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c13-20020a5d4ccd000000b002ce3d3d17e5sm2380854wrt.79.2023.03.11.04.27.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 11 Mar 2023 04:27:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 12:27:24 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/529] 5.10.173-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20230310133804.978589368@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230310133804.978589368@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 02:32:23PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.173 release. > There are 529 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 12 Mar 2023 13:36:38 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230210): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 104 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Note: s390 build failed with the error: drivers/s390/block/dasd_diag.c:656:23: error: initialization of 'int (*)(struct dasd_device *, __u8)' {aka 'int (*)(struct dasd_device *, unsigned char)'} from incompatible pointer type 'int (*)(struct dasd_device *, __u8, __u8)' {aka 'int (*)(struct dasd_device *, unsigned char, unsigned char)'} [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] 656 | .pe_handler = dasd_diag_pe_handler, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/s390/block/dasd_diag.c:656:23: note: (near initialization for 'dasd_diag_discipline.pe_handler') Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3079 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3083 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip