Date:   Sat, 11 Mar 2023 12:47:24 +0000
From:   Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
        patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de,
        jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net,
        rwarsow@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/136] 5.15.100-rc1 review
Message-ID: <ZAx4XI1QOYyHPA2K@debian>
References: <20230310133706.811226272@linuxfoundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230310133706.811226272@linuxfoundation.org>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Greg,

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 02:42:02PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.100 release.
> There are 136 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 12 Mar 2023 13:36:38 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20230210):
mips: 62 configs -> no failure
arm: 99 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Failed to boot on my test laptop.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]

Note:
Failed to boot on my test laptop, just black screen.
Bisect pointed to 4eb6789f9177 ("drm/i915: Don't use BAR mappings for ring buffers with LLC")
which was added in v5.15.99. I failed to test v5.15.99 due to lack of time. :(


[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3075
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3084

Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

-- 
Regards
Sudip