Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B154C6FD1C for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 14:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230092AbjCKO5j (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Mar 2023 09:57:39 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43762 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229514AbjCKO5e (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Mar 2023 09:57:34 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A28B311CD59 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 06:57:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id f11so7581319wrv.8 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 06:57:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1678546652; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GC6gxLkSt5uTZ0ymTf46wy5yL9s9aDluG3wBqWBs5Ao=; b=mwrsq1VcC7yLQT2peO2jhfVyQfYoiHwH/7siU/J2z79i1jFLG4uz/471lo1ufUlIxf We0Vk2fyJoJoAPmlkC8+S/7rVPLKc5WTVkSBjUNmw2TrTVEssuZF81WrVVEgi04tDTbZ EcuPZdbhDBjMJzQWeSKV0gHqK+KlEL02TW6xgXA6k5clPzSqUKHIo/d331SlI+GUXrDd UyhlCgvpyEuNAa/D2FkDOoG0XjZ3kuIjQvA9CZWLI1JqujotyAxFxJpMnFWFd67PB78O 5cBKSPKafMskDRL6iA2WjzjHSA0WeZhitgr+e8Hc7zNcPoiDCAYQ4h1w9g/vJSYy6JKX fqbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678546652; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GC6gxLkSt5uTZ0ymTf46wy5yL9s9aDluG3wBqWBs5Ao=; b=onJ5nl41EdNbXtRn+pZ+Rk7wwjuF09vCtGQ2qnXZhhHI7bC4+Ds/3HFYE0PEQadr/D rWuveQaRTjn3mL3Yr/8EGGl/jmacrkFxaN5aDifGAbrjPQkXvUSFUnY2AP6ZfaeLj6J/ av+A/pgue0YV7auWCN7qEbU+blla6zzgVQz00NfSV47QlV3110x4cEqBmT5ELLIOYW7S GGXA29Lx8r+FdPfzKKsnzb1Qbjbc798QhFgQLlwKTH0KH98V9GSTwgZJk+M3t1GKwEF7 iH95rzmoarL1a+OCIONhfH2+QWt5FD5p8FhSRQ9LFTTfqqPpxxfmQimenZeW+vZqk6Ck wnvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXoMASMJFyVjxsap5LSB0qOgRa8TqkJ/uabMZMdTZdDMlsNJdIu 4Uq9abVnqHMt3lOIZAtgvNw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/Q3Vr4JzSplTmjuQ/xbzBkpAmKAmEVXbj4GktdLASUu6uqDjE9uVWntvD/iu2IJncPWvOsfQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4e85:0:b0:2c7:1aaa:2b49 with SMTP id e5-20020a5d4e85000000b002c71aaa2b49mr20838137wru.23.1678546652156; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 06:57:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.16] ([41.42.191.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j28-20020a5d6e5c000000b002c551f7d452sm2520623wrz.98.2023.03.11.06.57.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 11 Mar 2023 06:57:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <59077252-02e4-dd43-77b5-2d2cfd114762@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 16:57:29 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: greybus: Fix Alignment with parenthesis Content-Language: en-US To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Julia Lawall , outreachy@lists.linux.dev, vireshk@kernel.org, johan@kernel.org, elder@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <71211670-60f9-11f4-1ee7-f94d4d9df4fb@gmail.com> <61dab579-f10b-5538-8b61-ebe73ae5b4f1@gmail.com> <27dfe880-35f7-cbc1-cf8b-7bbd7f1c7301@gmail.com> From: Menna Mahmoud In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On ١١‏/٣‏/٢٠٢٣ ١٦:٢٣, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 04:06:51PM +0200, Menna Mahmoud wrote: >> according to Alex feedback >> >> " I think this type of alignment is not a major problem, >> and alignment isn't done this way in general in this >> driver, it's probably OK to keep it that way. - Alex " >> >> >> ,I won't resubmit these patches, right? > Yeah. Find something else to fix. > > I feel like in outreachy and similar that people send a first patch and > then they get a bunch of different feedback. And it's like checkpatch > is complaining and it's staging code so probably the code is actually > ugly in a way. But often it's better to abandon the project instead of > getting obsessed with it. Zoom out a bit. Find something else where > it's obvious how to improve the code from a readability perspective. > > People are giving you feedback to help you and not because they are > about that particular line of code. They won't care if you work on > something else instead. > > regards, > dan carpenter Got it, thanks Dan. >