Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753574AbXIPO4W (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Sep 2007 10:56:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752657AbXIPO4P (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Sep 2007 10:56:15 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:42610 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752513AbXIPO4O (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Sep 2007 10:56:14 -0400 Message-ID: <46ED440E.3020209@goop.org> Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 07:56:14 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rusty Russell CC: Alexey Eremenko , lkml - Kernel Mailing List , virtualization Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Consolidate host virtualization support under Virtualization menu References: <1189747054.7262.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1189747124.7262.36.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070914091921.73007c5a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <1189825504.7262.75.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7fac565a0709150149kf55de62q92496cf74e7b0581@mail.gmail.com> <1189928617.7262.98.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1189928617.7262.98.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 563 Lines: 14 Rusty Russell wrote: > Well, containerization deserves its own menu, but the question is does i > it belong under this menu? No, I don't think so. While there are some broad similarities in effect, the technology is completely different, as are the capabilities and tradeoffs. They're pretty much orthogonal. J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/