MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230131223529.11905-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
 <CAMuHMdX3OHuq15m=g56faaU6EySYeKmRvbmJdty1xZ6JOu-yzg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMuHMdVB13VX32Qi3Y5pTWA1j6yODFohrNArhRvdVUQX085sWw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdVB13VX32Qi3Y5pTWA1j6yODFohrNArhRvdVUQX085sWw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 12 Mar 2023 20:07:37 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+V-a8sSm3_bWg_XOm=DB9G-Kb_LQ99_-t12bmLumjTZiinMcA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Share RZ/G2L SoC DTSI with RZ/V2L SoC
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
        linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Hi Geert,

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 10:41=E2=80=AFAM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 3:16=E2=80=AFPM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m=
68k.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 11:42 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>=
 wrote:
> > > This series aims to reuse RZ/G2L SoC DTSI with RZ/V2L as both the SoC=
s are
> > > almost identical.
> > >
> > > v1 -> v2
> > > * Patch 1/2 unchanged, for patch 2/2 sorted the nodes based on the na=
mes.
> > >
> > > v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/cover/2023=
0127133909.144774-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com/
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Prabhakar
> > >
> > > Lad Prabhakar (2):
> > >   arm64: dts: renesas: r9a07g044: Use SoC specific macro for CPG and
> > >     RESET
> > >   arm64: dts: renesas: r9a07g054: Reuse RZ/G2L SoC DTSI
> > >
> > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi |  254 ++---
> > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g054.dtsi | 1149 +++---------------=
--
> > >  2 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 1147 deletions(-)
> >
> > Do you have an opinion on this series?
> > Is this acceptable for you?
> > The final generated DTBs are identical to before.
>
> Given the feedback from Krzysztof and Rob on patch 1, and on IRC,
> I'm rejecting this series.
>
Ok, I'll rebase CRU work by dropping this series.

Cheers,
Prabhakar